On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 02:20:33AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 10:41:45PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 12:22:47AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > > This patchset is a second one in the series created in the framework of > > > my Baikal-T1 PCIe/eDMA-related work: > > > > > > [1: In-progress v3] clk: Baikal-T1 DDR/PCIe resets and some xGMAC fixes > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220503205722.24755-1-Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > [2: In-progress v2] PCI: dwc: Various fixes and cleanups > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220324012524.16784-1-Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > [3: In-progress v1] PCI: dwc: Add dma-ranges/YAML-schema/Baikal-T1 support > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220324013734.18234-1-Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > [4: In-progress v1] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add RP/EP local DMA controllers support > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220324014836.19149-1-Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > Note it is very recommended to merge the patchsets in the same order as > > > they are placed in the list above in order to prevent possible merge/build > > > conflicts. Nothing prevents them from being reviewed synchronously though. > > > > > > As it can be easily inferred from the patchset title, this series is about > > > the DW PCIe Root Port/End-point driver fixes and the code cleanups, where > > > fixes come before the cleanup patches. The patchset starts with adding the > > > stop_link() platform-specific method invocation in case of the PCIe host > > > probe procedure errors. It has been missing in the cleanup-on-error path > > > of the DW PCIe Host initialization method. After that there is a patch > > > which fixes the host own cfg-space accessors for the case of the > > > platform-specific DBI implementation. Third the unrolled CSRs layout is > > > added to the iATU disable procedure. Fourth the disable iATU procedure is > > > fixed to be called only for the internal ATU as being specific for the > > > internal ATU implementation. Last but no least the outbound iATU extended > > > region setup procedure is fixed to have the INCREASE_REGION_SIZE flag set > > > based on the limit-address - not the region size one. > > > > > > Afterwards there is a series of cleanups. It concerns the changes like > > > adding braces to the multi-line if-else constructions, trailing new-lines > > > to the print format-string, dropping unnecessary version checking, and > > > various code simplifications and optimizations. > > > > Hi, > > > > I went through the series and I don't have any specific objections. > > > > > We can try to queue it for v5.19, with the caveat that the fixes > > _need_ testing on several DWC platforms > > Alas I can't deliver that. But Manivannan has done a testing on his > Qualcomm devices. Fixes need testing. I don't want to merge fixes that break platforms on which you can't test. Also, fixes need bug reports and as far as I can see I have not seen any reported that point at current mainline failures. > > (and I _strongly_ encourage > > DWC maintainers to chime in). To sum it up: > > > > > - It is a mixture of clean-ups and fixes. I would prefer having the > > cleanups earlier in the series and rebase (if there is a need, I > > can try to reshuffle the patches myself) the fixes on top. That > > because we may have to drop some of the fixes (and if we merge them > > we may have to revert them as cleanly as we can), > > Normally fixes patches go before ahead of the rest of the series to > simplify the backporting procedure (makes Greg's life much easier). See above. We should not have fixes and cleanups in the same series and I am not taking fixes that can affect other platforms unless they are tested. > Revertability has much less priority. In the worst case an additional > fixes patch is more preferable especially if the original patch has > been reviewed, accepted and most likely backported. Only if the patch > author didn't provide a fix then the reversion is proceeded. So I > wouldn't recommend to reshuffle the patches. Feel free to ignore what I say, my comments still stand. > > my concern is that > > they require testing on a number of platforms you have not been > > exposed to > > This series and another patchsets have been available for testing for > about two months now. There have been more than enough time to give it > a try and review. Sure. To merge fixes they need to be tested on platforms before we can accept them and we need bug reports to show they are fixing something in the first place. > > - Kbot complained about patch (3) > > Could you be more specific what it was complaining about? I haven't > got any relevant message in none of my emails. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/202205041128.dPzBiZsY-lkp@xxxxxxxxx > > - I will have comments about the commit logs but I can try to fix them > > myself > > Feel free to submit your comments. I'll take them into account in v3. > > > > > I have concerns especially about patches (2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9), because > > they can affect DWC platforms other than the ones you are testing on. > > Basically any generic code change affects the dependent platforms. If > you don't see any exact issue in mind then I don't see any reason to > sustain the series any longer especially seeing it has been already > tested on an alternative platform. See above. > > The cleanups we can definitely queue them up. > > > As I said, and there > > is nothing I can do about it, I will be off the radar for two months > > from wednesday, > > As I noted this isn't good since I haven't noticed much activity for > the last two months. Alas Bjorn hasn't participated in the review > process either. I can offer a help with reviewing the patches > concerning the DW PCIe drivers since during the patchsets development > I've got a good notion regarding the DWC drivers and HW internals. But > it only concerns the DW PCIe Host/End-point code. We(I) don't have DWC HW and DWC maintainers are supposed to review DWC code. We maintain the generic bits in host controller drivers to make sure they guarantee a uniform behaviour across hosts. That's what I have to say. If you want your code merged we need to find a way to get DWC maintainers to test it and provide review, I agree with you that feedback is lacking and that's something that has to be solved. Thanks for your patience. Lorenzo > > please try to repost with the Kbot issue fixed and > > See my comment above regarding kbot. > > -Sergey > > > with the comments above in mind and I will do my best to queue as > > many patches from this series as possible for v5.19. > > > > Thanks, > > Lorenzo > > > > > New features like adding two-level DT bindings abstraction, adding better > > > structured IP-core version interface, adding iATU regions size detection > > > and the PCIe regions verification procedure, adding dma-ranges support, > > > introducing a set of generic platform clocks and resets and finally adding > > > Baikal-T1 PCIe interface support will be submitted in the next part of the > > > series. > > > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220324012524.16784-1-Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > Changelog v2: > > > - Fix the end address of the example in the patch log with > > > the INCREASE_REGION_SIZE flag usage fixup. It should be > > > 0x1000FFFF and not 0x0000FFFF (@Manivannan). > > > - Add the cleanup-on-error path to the dw_pcie_ep_init() function. > > > (@Manivannan) > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Serge Semin (13): > > > PCI: dwc: Stop link in the host init error and de-initialization > > > PCI: dwc: Don't use generic IO-ops for DBI-space access > > > PCI: dwc: Add unroll iATU space support to the regions disable method > > > PCI: dwc: Disable outbound windows for controllers with iATU > > > PCI: dwc: Set INCREASE_REGION_SIZE flag based on limit address > > > PCI: dwc: Add braces to the multi-line if-else statements > > > PCI: dwc: Add trailing new-line literals to the log messages > > > PCI: dwc: Discard IP-core version checking on unrolled iATU detection > > > PCI: dwc: Convert Link-up status method to using dw_pcie_readl_dbi() > > > PCI: dwc: Deallocate EPC memory on EP init error > > > PCI: dwc-plat: Simplify the probe method return value handling > > > PCI: dwc-plat: Discard unused regmap pointer > > > PCI: dwc-plat: Drop dw_plat_pcie_of_match forward declaration > > > > > > .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 22 +++++-- > > > .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 66 +++++++++++++++---- > > > .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c | 13 ++-- > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 48 +++++++++----- > > > 4 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) > > > > > > -- > > > 2.35.1 > > >
