On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 01:36:51PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > In the subject, "Fix interrupt mapping ..." is too general. Almost > all patches "fix" something, so all we learn is that this is something > to do with multi-MSI. It's better if you can say something specific, > like the fact that you now ensure that multi-MSI vectors are aligned > and consecutive. I see that the message threading was messed up (ideally each of the patches would be a response to the [0/2] cover letter), so I didn't see that this has already been applied. Sorry for the noise. Bjorn
