On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 08:07:33AM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> In the multi-MSI case, hv_arch_irq_unmask() will only operate on the first
> MSI of the N allocated. This is because only the first msi_desc is cached
> and it is shared by all the MSIs of the multi-MSI block. This means that
> hv_arch_irq_unmask() gets the correct address, but the wrong data (always
> 0).
>
> This can break MSIs.
>
> Lets assume MSI0 is vector 34 on CPU0, and MSI1 is vector 33 on CPU0.
>
> hv_arch_irq_unmask() is called on MSI0. It uses a hypercall to configure
> the MSI address and data (0) to vector 34 of CPU0. This is correct. Then
> hv_arch_irq_unmask is called on MSI1. It uses another hypercall to
> configure the MSI address and data (0) to vector 33 of CPU0. This is
> wrong, and results in both MSI0 and MSI1 being routed to vector 33. Linux
> will observe extra instances of MSI1 and no instances of MSI0 despite the
> endpoint device behaving correctly.
>
> For the multi-MSI case, we need unique address and data info for each MSI,
> but the cached msi_desc does not provide that. However, that information
> can be gotten from the int_desc cached in the chip_data by
> compose_msi_msg(). Fix the multi-MSI case to use that cached information
> instead. Since hv_set_msi_entry_from_desc() is no longer applicable,
> remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 12 ++++--------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> index 5800ecf..7aea0b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> @@ -611,13 +611,6 @@ static unsigned int hv_msi_get_int_vector(struct irq_data *data)
> return cfg->vector;
> }
>
> -static void hv_set_msi_entry_from_desc(union hv_msi_entry *msi_entry,
> - struct msi_desc *msi_desc)
> -{
> - msi_entry->address.as_uint32 = msi_desc->msg.address_lo;
> - msi_entry->data.as_uint32 = msi_desc->msg.data;
> -}
> -
Instead of dropping this function, can you change the second argument to
take struct tran_int_desc *?
This way you can use the same function in hv_compose_msi_msg.
Thanks,
Wei.
> static int hv_msi_prepare(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
> int nvec, msi_alloc_info_t *info)
> {
> @@ -647,6 +640,7 @@ static void hv_arch_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
> {
> struct msi_desc *msi_desc = irq_data_get_msi_desc(data);
> struct hv_retarget_device_interrupt *params;
> + struct tran_int_desc *int_desc;
> struct hv_pcibus_device *hbus;
> struct cpumask *dest;
> cpumask_var_t tmp;
> @@ -661,6 +655,7 @@ static void hv_arch_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
> pdev = msi_desc_to_pci_dev(msi_desc);
> pbus = pdev->bus;
> hbus = container_of(pbus->sysdata, struct hv_pcibus_device, sysdata);
> + int_desc = data->chip_data;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&hbus->retarget_msi_interrupt_lock, flags);
>
> @@ -668,7 +663,8 @@ static void hv_arch_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
> memset(params, 0, sizeof(*params));
> params->partition_id = HV_PARTITION_ID_SELF;
> params->int_entry.source = HV_INTERRUPT_SOURCE_MSI;
> - hv_set_msi_entry_from_desc(¶ms->int_entry.msi_entry, msi_desc);
> + params->int_entry.msi_entry.address.as_uint32 = int_desc->address & 0xffffffff;
> + params->int_entry.msi_entry.data.as_uint32 = int_desc->data;
> params->device_id = (hbus->hdev->dev_instance.b[5] << 24) |
> (hbus->hdev->dev_instance.b[4] << 16) |
> (hbus->hdev->dev_instance.b[7] << 8) |
> --
> 2.7.4
>
