Hi, > Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. April 2022 um 18:04 Uhr > Von: "Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> > > - bifurcation: true > > - > > Why are you adding "bifurcation" earlier in the series, then > immediately removing it? Why not just add "lane-map" directly and > never mention "bifurcation" in the DT at all? The original driver used the bifurcation property with vendor prefix which i have dropped. In v1 there was an Idea to replace this bifurcation setting by something more generic supporting more that just true/false. So i added lane-map to start discussion if this is the right way or if i should leave the bifurcation property. if the lane-map is right, i squash the commits before the commits should land in linux... this is one cause i tagged the series as RFC. regards Frank
