On 22/04/2022 21:09, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> >> Opposite, I wish platforms to be specific, which need atu which not. >> However I wish the strictly defined, same order for everyone because it >> looks possible. > > Well, the same order is not possible, since for some devices the first, > address-defining reg is "parf", for others it is "dbi". So, there will > be two "families" of the devices. Unless we want to change the DT > address of the unit. I missed that, so my feedback is not correct. Better to not change the unit addresses. You can still leave the "reg" and "reg-names" with generic constraints in the main properties part, but the rest looks actually correct. Best regards, Krzysztof
