On 2022/2/22 19:17, John Garry wrote:
>
>> +
>> static irqreturn_t hisi_ptt_irq(int irq, void *context)
>> {
>> struct hisi_ptt *hisi_ptt = context;
>> @@ -169,7 +233,7 @@ static irqreturn_t hisi_ptt_irq(int irq, void *context)
>> if (!(status & HISI_PTT_TRACE_INT_STAT_MASK))
>> return IRQ_NONE;
>> - return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> + return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
>> }
>> static void hisi_ptt_irq_free_vectors(void *pdev)
>> @@ -192,8 +256,10 @@ static int hisi_ptt_register_irq(struct hisi_ptt *hisi_ptt)
>> if (ret < 0)
>> return ret;
>> - ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, pci_irq_vector(pdev, HISI_PTT_TRACE_DMA_IRQ),
>> - hisi_ptt_irq, 0, DRV_NAME, hisi_ptt);
>> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev,
>
> why add code in patch 2/8 and then immediately change 3/8?
>
My bad patch split. As replied to Patch 2, the whole IRQ handler part will be remove in Patch 2
and we won't have this changing here.
>> + pci_irq_vector(pdev, HISI_PTT_TRACE_DMA_IRQ),
>> + hisi_ptt_irq, hisi_ptt_isr, 0,
>> + DRV_NAME, hisi_ptt);
>> if (ret) {
>> pci_err(pdev, "failed to request irq %d, ret = %d.\n",
>> pci_irq_vector(pdev, HISI_PTT_TRACE_DMA_IRQ), ret);
>> @@ -270,6 +336,429 @@ static void hisi_ptt_init_ctrls(struct hisi_ptt *hisi_ptt)
>> hisi_ptt->trace_ctrl.default_cpu = cpumask_first(cpumask_of_node(dev_to_node(&pdev->dev)));
>> }
>> +#define HISI_PTT_PMU_FILTER_IS_PORT BIT(19)
>> +#define HISI_PTT_PMU_FILTER_VAL_MASK GENMASK(15, 0)
>> +#define HISI_PTT_PMU_DIRECTION_MASK GENMASK(23, 20)
>> +#define HISI_PTT_PMU_TYPE_MASK GENMASK(31, 24)
>> +#define HISI_PTT_PMU_FORMAT_MASK GENMASK(35, 32)
>> +
>> +static ssize_t available_root_port_filters_show(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct hisi_ptt *hisi_ptt = to_hisi_ptt(dev_get_drvdata(dev));
>> + struct hisi_ptt_filter_desc *filter;
>> + int pos = 0;
>> +
>> + if (list_empty(&hisi_ptt->port_filters))
>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "\n");
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&hisi_ptt->mutex);
>> + list_for_each_entry(filter, &hisi_ptt->port_filters, list)
>> + pos += sysfs_emit_at(buf, pos, "%s 0x%05lx\n",
>> + pci_name(filter->pdev),
>> + hisi_ptt_get_filter_val(filter->pdev) |
>> + HISI_PTT_PMU_FILTER_IS_PORT);
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&hisi_ptt->mutex);
>> + return pos;
>> +}
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_ADMIN_RO(available_root_port_filters);
>> +
>> +static ssize_t available_requester_filters_show(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct hisi_ptt *hisi_ptt = to_hisi_ptt(dev_get_drvdata(dev));
>> + struct hisi_ptt_filter_desc *filter;
>> + int pos = 0;
>> +
>> + if (list_empty(&hisi_ptt->port_filters))
>
> is this supposed to be req_filters? And is it safe to access without locking?
>
Thanks for catching this! will fix it.
>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "\n");
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&hisi_ptt->mutex);
>> + list_for_each_entry(filter, &hisi_ptt->req_filters, list)
>> + pos += sysfs_emit_at(buf, pos, "%s 0x%05x\n",
>> + pci_name(filter->pdev),
>> + hisi_ptt_get_filter_val(filter->pdev));
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&hisi_ptt->mutex);
>> + return pos;
>> +}
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_ADMIN_RO(available_requester_filters);
>> +
>> +PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(filter, "config:0-19");
>> +PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(direction, "config:20-23");
>> +PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(type, "config:24-31");
>> +PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(format, "config:32-35");
>> +
>> +static struct attribute *hisi_ptt_pmu_format_attrs[] = {
>> + &format_attr_filter.attr,
>> + &format_attr_direction.attr,
>> + &format_attr_type.attr,
>> + &format_attr_format.attr,
>> + NULL
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct attribute_group hisi_ptt_pmu_format_group = {
>> + .name = "format",
>> + .attrs = hisi_ptt_pmu_format_attrs,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct attribute *hisi_ptt_pmu_filter_attrs[] = {
>> + &dev_attr_available_root_port_filters.attr,
>> + &dev_attr_available_requester_filters.attr,
>> + NULL
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct attribute_group hisi_ptt_pmu_filter_group = {
>> + .attrs = hisi_ptt_pmu_filter_attrs,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct attribute_group *hisi_ptt_pmu_groups[] = {
>> + &hisi_ptt_pmu_format_group,
>> + &hisi_ptt_pmu_filter_group,
>> + NULL
>> +};
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * The supported value of the direction parameter. See hisi_ptt.rst
>> + * documentation for more details.
>> + */
>> +static u32 hisi_ptt_trace_available_direction[] = {
>> + 0,
>> + 1,
>> + 2,
>> + 3,
>
> this seems a very odd array.
>
I copied part of the definition of this parameter from the hisi_ptt.rst below:
When the desired format is 4DW, directions and related values
supported are shown below:
4'b0000: inbound TLPs (P, NP, CPL)
4'b0001: outbound TLPs (P, NP, CPL)
4'b0010: outbound TLPs (P, NP, CPL) and inbound TLPs (P, NP, CPL B)
4'b0011: outbound TLPs (P, NP, CPL) and inbound TLPs (CPL A)
When the desired format is 8DW, directions and related values supported are
shown below:
4'b0000: reserved
4'b0001: outbound TLPs (P, NP, CPL)
4'b0010: inbound TLPs (P, NP, CPL B)
4'b0011: inbound TLPs (CPL A)
Since the meaning of the `direction` highly depends on the configuration of the `format`
so the meaning is not commented here but redirect the readers to the documentation
where have detailed description.
> And I assume it is const as it is modified - can this be non-global and tied to the device context?
>
ok. will make const and into the functions which use this.
Thanks,
Yicong
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Different types can be set simultaneously */
>> +static u32 hisi_ptt_trace_available_type[] = {
>> + 1, /* posted_request */
>> + 2, /* non-posted_request */
>> + 4, /* completion */
>> +};
>> +
>> +static u32 hisi_ptt_trace_availble_format[] = {
>> + 0, /* 4DW */
>> + 1, /* 8DW */
>> +};
>> +
> .
