Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker speaking. Top-posting for once, to make this easy accessible to everyone. What's the status of this regression and getting it fixed? It looks like there was quite some progress for a while, but then things seem to have come to a halt ten days ago. Could anyone please provide a status update, please? Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'Linux kernel regression tracker' hat) P.S.: As a Linux kernel regression tracker I'm getting a lot of reports on my table. I can only look briefly into most of them. Unfortunately therefore I sometimes will get things wrong or miss something important. I hope that's not the case here; if you think it is, don't hesitate to tell me about it in a public reply, that's in everyone's interest. #regzbot poke On 11.02.22 03:16, dann frazier wrote: > On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 08:34:45AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 7:19 PM dann frazier <dann.frazier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 10:09:31AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: >>>> On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 3:13 PM dann frazier <dann.frazier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 9:05 AM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 5:01 PM dann frazier <dann.frazier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:36:37AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: >>>>>>>> Commit 6dce5aa59e0b ("PCI: xgene: Use inbound resources for setup") >>>>>>>> broke PCI support on XGene. The cause is the IB resources are now sorted >>>>>>>> in address order instead of being in DT dma-ranges order. The result is >>>>>>>> which inbound registers are used for each region are swapped. I don't >>>>>>>> know the details about this h/w, but it appears that IB region 0 >>>>>>>> registers can't handle a size greater than 4GB. In any case, limiting >>>>>>>> the size for region 0 is enough to get back to the original assignment >>>>>>>> of dma-ranges to regions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> hey Rob! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've been seeing a panic on HP Moonshoot m400 cartridges (X-Gene1) - >>>>>>> only during network installs - that I also bisected down to commit >>>>>>> 6dce5aa59e0b ("PCI: xgene: Use inbound resources for setup"). I was >>>>>>> hoping that this patch that fixed the issue on Stéphane's X-Gene2 >>>>>>> system would also fix my issue, but no luck. In fact, it seems to just >>>>>>> makes it fail differently. Reverting both patches is required to get a >>>>>>> v5.17-rc kernel to boot. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've collected the following logs - let me know if anything else would >>>>>>> be useful. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1) v5.17-rc2+ (unmodified): >>>>>>> http://dannf.org/bugs/m400-no-reverts.log >>>>>>> Note that the mlx4 driver fails initialization. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2) v5.17-rc2+, w/o the commit that fixed Stéphane's system: >>>>>>> http://dannf.org/bugs/m400-xgene2-fix-reverted.log >>>>>>> Note the mlx4 MSI-X timeout, and later panic. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 3) v5.17-rc2+, w/ both commits reverted (works) >>>>>>> http://dannf.org/bugs/m400-both-reverted.log >>>>>> >>>>>> The ranges and dma-ranges addresses don't appear to match up with any >>>>>> upstream dts files. Can you send me the DT? >>>>> >>>>> Sure: http://dannf.org/bugs/fdt >>>> >>>> The first fix certainly is a problem. It's going to need something >>>> besides size to key off of (originally it was dependent on order of >>>> dma-ranges entries). >>>> >>>> The 2nd issue is the 'dma-ranges' has a second entry that is now ignored: >>>> >>>> dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x00>, <0x00 >>>> 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>>> >>>> Based on the flags (3rd addr cell: 0x0), we have an inbound config >>>> space which the kernel now ignores because inbound config space >>>> accesses make no sense. But clearly some setup is needed. Upstream, in >>>> contrast, sets up a memory range that includes this region, so the >>>> setup does happen: >>>> >>>> <0x42000000 0x00 0x00000000 0x00 0x00000000 0x80 0x00000000> >>>> >>>> Minimally, I suspect it will work if you change dma-ranges 2nd entry to: >>>> >>>> <0x42000000 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000> >>> >>> Thanks for looking into this Rob. I tried to test that theory, but it >>> didn't seem to work. This is what I tried: >>> >>> --- m400.dts 2022-02-07 20:16:44.840475323 +0000 >>> +++ m400.dts.dmaonly 2022-02-08 00:17:54.097132000 +0000 >>> @@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ >>> reg = <0x00 0x1f2b0000 0x00 0x10000 0xe0 0xd0000000 0x00 0x200000 0x00 0x79e00000 0x00 0x2000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>> reg-names = "csr\0cfg\0msi_gen\0msi_term"; >>> ranges = <0x1000000 0x00 0x00 0xe0 0x10000000 0x00 0x10000 0x2000000 0x00 0x30000000 0xe1 0x30000000 0x00 0x80000000>; >>> - dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>> + dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x00 0x42000000 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>> ib-ranges = <0x42000000 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>> ib-ranges-ep = <0x2000000 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x400000 0x2000000 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x400000 0x2000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x100000>; >>> interrupts = <0x00 0x10 0x04>; >>> @@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ >>> reg = <0x00 0x1f2c0000 0x00 0x10000 0xd0 0xd0000000 0x00 0x200000 0x00 0x79e00000 0x00 0x2000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>> reg-names = "csr\0cfg\0msi_gen\0msi_term"; >>> ranges = <0x1000000 0x00 0x00 0xd0 0x10000000 0x00 0x10000 0x2000000 0x00 0x30000000 0xd1 0x30000000 0x00 0x80000000>; >>> - dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>> + dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x00 0x42000000 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>> ib-ranges = <0x42000000 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>> ib-ranges-ep = <0x2000000 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x400000 0x2000000 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x400000 0x2000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x100000>; >>> interrupts = <0x00 0x10 0x04>; >>> @@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ >>> reg = <0x00 0x1f2d0000 0x00 0x10000 0x90 0xd0000000 0x00 0x200000 0x00 0x79e00000 0x00 0x2000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>> reg-names = "csr\0cfg\0msi_gen\0msi_term"; >>> ranges = <0x1000000 0x00 0x00 0x90 0x10000000 0x00 0x10000 0x2000000 0x00 0x30000000 0x91 0x30000000 0x00 0x80000000>; >>> - dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>> + dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x00 0x42000000 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>> ib-ranges = <0x42000000 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>> ib-ranges-ep = <0x2000000 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x400000 0x2000000 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x400000 0x2000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x100000>; >>> interrupts = <0x00 0x10 0x04>; >>> @@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ >>> reg = <0x00 0x1f500000 0x00 0x10000 0xa0 0xd0000000 0x00 0x200000 0x00 0x79e00000 0x00 0x2000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>> reg-names = "csr\0cfg\0msi_gen\0msi_term"; >>> ranges = <0x2000000 0x00 0x30000000 0xa1 0x30000000 0x00 0x80000000>; >>> - dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>> + dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x00 0x42000000 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>> ib-ranges = <0x42000000 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>> ib-ranges-ep = <0x2000000 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x400000 0x2000000 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x400000 0x2000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x100000>; >>> interrupts = <0x00 0x10 0x04>; >>> @@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ >>> reg = <0x00 0x1f510000 0x00 0x10000 0xc0 0xd0000000 0x00 0x200000 0x00 0x79e00000 0x00 0x2000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>> reg-names = "csr\0cfg\0msi_gen\0msi_term"; >>> ranges = <0x1000000 0x00 0x00 0xc0 0x10000000 0x00 0x10000 0x2000000 0x00 0x30000000 0xc1 0x30000000 0x00 0x80000000>; >>> - dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>> + dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x00 0x42000000 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>> ib-ranges = <0x42000000 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x40 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x800000>; >>> ib-ranges-ep = <0x2000000 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x400000 0x2000000 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x400000 0x2000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x00 0x100000>; >>> interrupts = <0x00 0x10 0x04>; >>> >>> And that failed to boot with a 5.17-rc3. Since dma-ranges was >>> previously identical to ib-ranges, I also tried making the same change >>> to ib-ranges, but with no success. >> >> Failed to boot at all or just PCIe still didn't work causing boot to >> eventually fail? > > Sorry, I mean PCIe still didn't work, here's the log: > http://dannf.org/bugs/m400-tweaked_dtb.log > (unmodified kernel source w/ above dtb change) > >> 'ib-ranges' is unknown to the kernel, so the firmware >> is using it somehow? >> >> You also need to revert the first fix for PCIe to work. > > Oh, OK. I misunderstood. I tried reverting commit 6dce5aa59e0b "PCI: > xgene: Use inbound resources for setup" along with a dtb with the > dma-ranges change in the diff above, but PCIe still didn't > work. Here's the log: > > http://dannf.org/bugs/m400-6dce5aa5_reverted+tweaked_dtb.log > > -dann > >> >>>> While we shouldn't break existing DTs, the moonshot DT doesn't use >>>> what's documented upstream. There are multiple differences compared to >>>> what's documented. Is upstream supposed to support upstream DTs, >>>> downstream DTs, and ACPI for XGene which is an abandoned platform with >>>> only a handful of users? >>> >>> That's a fair question, though it's one of a policy, and I feel I'd be >>> overstepping by weighing in. I suppose one option I have is to try >>> and create and upstream a dts for these systems and modify our >>> boot.scr to always load that over the one provided by firmware. While >>> we do have some of these systems in production, they are being retired >>> and replaced with newer kit over time, and it's possible we'll never >>> need to upgrade them to a modern kernel. >>> >>> -dann