On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 07:30:39PM +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > Well, thing is, you -already- have the whole "performance" option which > is what we are 'arguing' about upstream. Except that the implementation > of it that you have in your tree now has very nasty bugs (ie it doesn't > do what it's supposed to and really doesn't work). > > Patches 1 and 2 fix it to do what it's supposed to. I'll agree with benh for now since, yes, the performance option is completely broken in just blindly applying settings right now. It should be revisted and made so that a safe performance setting is supported in the future (possibly via suggestions from arch-specific quirks), since having to configure this makes little sense for the vast majority of users. Applying 3/3 first would also make the most sense. -ben -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
