Hello Richard, On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 11:25:32AM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote: > The driver should undo any enables it did itself. The regulator disable > shouldn't be basing decisions on regulator_is_enabled(). > > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 14 ++------------ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c > index 0aca762d88a3..e165ad00989c 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c > @@ -369,8 +369,6 @@ static int imx6_pcie_attach_pd(struct device *dev) > > static void imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) > { > - struct device *dev = imx6_pcie->pci->dev; > - > switch (imx6_pcie->drvdata->variant) { > case IMX7D: > case IMX8MQ: > @@ -400,14 +398,6 @@ static void imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) > IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_REF_CLK_EN, 0 << 16); > break; > } > - > - if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie->vpcie) > 0) { > - int ret = regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie); > - > - if (ret) > - dev_err(dev, "failed to disable vpcie regulator: %d\n", > - ret); > - } This commit is not just cleaning up the regulator usage as you state in the commit message, this is removing the vpcie regulator_disable from imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(). I would not do it, this is called for example on the shutdown callback where it makes sense. Francesco