Thanks Srivatsa for clarification, even I am surprised to see this. I will send V2 of the patch, hopefully that should appear in the thread. On 22/01/22, 7:42 AM, "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >Hi Bjorn, > >On 1/21/22 11:42 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 05:26:35PM +0000, Vikash Bansal wrote: >>> On 20/01/22, 11:56 AM, "Greg KH" <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Run pahole for pci_dev structure, it is not adding any padding bytes. >>> Please refer to my previous email for replies to Greg's other comments. >> >> Please don't indent your entire response. The original posting >> apparently didn't go to linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or was rejected, >> maybe because it wasn't plain text (see >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fvger.kernel.org%2Fmajordomo-info.html&data=04%7C01%7Cbvikas%40vmware.com%7Caeeecd0515704520558208d9dd4cb350%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637784143774862668%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=DeEhueGnvJRTeavdK86HO2cSDEwWh7DLTte%2F4P00alA%3D&reserved=0)? >> >> It doesn't appear in the thread at >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Fall%2F7E2C2648-76CE-4987-AB4F-7B4576F10D7B%40vmware.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cbvikas%40vmware.com%7Caeeecd0515704520558208d9dd4cb350%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637784143774862668%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=iTMr0mSNFph6AWMohfyCGxM6rVwXTjUQ5QW29bhecMQ%3D&reserved=0 >> > >Looking at the source for Vikash's first email in this thread, I see: >"Content-Type: text/plain", so I don't think that was the issue. Also, >the patch was sent using git-send-email: "X-Mailer: git-send-email >2.6.2". > >Is there a way to find out exactly why that email might have prompted >the mailing list to drop it? > >Thank you! > >Regards, >Srivatsa >VMware Photon OS