On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 10:55 AM Pali Rohár <pali@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thursday 20 January 2022 10:49:05 Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 04:18:11PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > Split struct pci_ops between ops and child_ops. Member ops is used for
> > > accessing PCIe Root Ports via pci-bridge-emul.c driver and child_ops for
> > > accessing real PCIe cards.
> > >
> > > There is no need to mix these two struct pci_ops into one as PCI core code
> > > already provides separate callbacks via bridge->ops and bridge->child_ops.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++--------------
> > > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> > > index 9ea2f6a7c2b0..1e90ab888075 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> > > @@ -294,11 +294,29 @@ static void mvebu_pcie_setup_hw(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
> > > mvebu_writel(port, mask, PCIE_MASK_OFF);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int mvebu_pcie_hw_rd_conf(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port,
> > > - struct pci_bus *bus,
> > > - u32 devfn, int where, int size, u32 *val)
> > > +static struct mvebu_pcie_port *mvebu_pcie_find_port(struct mvebu_pcie *pcie,
> > > + struct pci_bus *bus,
> > > + int devfn);
> > > +
> > > +static int mvebu_pcie_child_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
> > > + int size, u32 *val)
> > > {
> > > - void __iomem *conf_data = port->base + PCIE_CONF_DATA_OFF;
> > > + struct mvebu_pcie *pcie = bus->sysdata;
> > > + struct mvebu_pcie_port *port;
> > > + void __iomem *conf_data;
> > > +
> > > + port = mvebu_pcie_find_port(pcie, bus, devfn);
> > > + if (!port) {
> > > + *val = 0xffffffff;
> > > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (!mvebu_pcie_link_up(port)) {
> > > + *val = 0xffffffff;
> > > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + conf_data = port->base + PCIE_CONF_DATA_OFF;
> > >
> > > mvebu_writel(port, PCIE_CONF_ADDR(bus->number, devfn, where),
> > > PCIE_CONF_ADDR_OFF);
> > > @@ -321,11 +339,21 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_hw_rd_conf(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port,
> > > return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int mvebu_pcie_hw_wr_conf(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port,
> > > - struct pci_bus *bus,
> > > - u32 devfn, int where, int size, u32 val)
> > > +static int mvebu_pcie_child_wr_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn,
> > > + int where, int size, u32 val)
> > > {
> > > - void __iomem *conf_data = port->base + PCIE_CONF_DATA_OFF;
> > > + struct mvebu_pcie *pcie = bus->sysdata;
> > > + struct mvebu_pcie_port *port;
> > > + void __iomem *conf_data;
> > > +
> >
> > > + port = mvebu_pcie_find_port(pcie, bus, devfn);
> > > + if (!port)
> > > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
> > > +
> > > + if (!mvebu_pcie_link_up(port))
> > > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
> > > +
> > > + conf_data = port->base + PCIE_CONF_DATA_OFF;
> >
> > Again, the same setup code in read and write is a sign to use
> > .map_bus(). You can copy it from my version I pointed you to.
> >
> > Rob
>
> I'm planning to do other cleanup in followup patches. But there are too
> many mvebu and aardvark patches on the list waiting, and I do not want
> to send another batch.
It can all be part of this patch.
Rob
