On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 1:25 AM Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:16:18 -0800 > Zayd Qumsieh <zaydq@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > Due to issues with vger.kernel.org marking HTML emails as spam, I'll > > be resending the email in plain text: > > > > > > > > Hello all, First off, thanks for your work on implementing PCI Data > > Object Exchange in QEMU and Linux. > > > > 1. Are these patches still being worked on? If not, I’ll try to get > > them rebased and finished. > > > > 2. Are there any notes not mentioned in the emails you feel are > > important to know about? > > > > 3. I'm particularly interested in the testing framework - the emails > > mention that a lot of testing has been done through QEMU but how can I > > carry out these tests on my own? What tools did you use? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Zayd > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211105235056.3711389-1-ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx/ > Is the latest version of this. For basic testing Ben's qemu branch should > work for you. > https://gitlab.com/bwidawsk/qemu/-/commits/cxl-2.0v4/ > > Note there are some big questions over the approach used for integrating > this with the PCI subsystem (auxiliary bus vs library) which I'm not sure > we've reached a conclusion on yet. > > One minor thing on the wish list is lspci support to at least identify the > presence of a DOE. I have patches for that and will send out fairly soon > once I've cleared a backlog of other stuff. > > My main focus right now is on resolving some of the opens around the > QEMU support for CXL emul in general, but I haven't touched the DOE stuff > beyond rebasing. *fingers crossed* I should have an updated qemu tree > out sometime in next week or so. > > Thanks, > > Jonathan Hey, I did some experimenting with Ben's QEMU branch and integrated your patch locally. I'll be doing some testing of my own. If I run into anything noteworthy I'll let you know. Again, thank you for all your help! :) Thanks, Zayd
