Re: [net-next 1/8] pci: Add flag indicating device has been assigned by KVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:04:59AM -0700, Rose, Gregory V wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 9:43 AM
> > To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T
> > Cc: Rose, Gregory V; Ian Campbell; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jesse Barnes;
> > netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gospo@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [net-next 1/8] pci: Add flag indicating device has been
> > assigned by KVM
> > 
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 08:45:09AM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 08:11 -0700, Rose, Gregory V wrote:
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ijc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > > > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 8:04 AM
> > > > > To: Rose, Gregory V
> > > > > Cc: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > Jesse
> > > > > Barnes; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gospo@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > > > > pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > Subject: RE: [net-next 1/8] pci: Add flag indicating device has been
> > > > > assigned by KVM
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 07:41 -0700, Rose, Gregory V wrote:
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ijc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > > > > > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 12:28 AM
> > > > > > > To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T
> > > > > > > Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx; Jesse Barnes;
> > Rose,
> > > > > > > Gregory V; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gospo@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > > > > > > pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [net-next 1/8] pci: Add flag indicating device has
> > been
> > > > > > > assigned by KVM
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I suppose by that measure the comment could be less KVM
> > specific:
> > > > > > > > +       /* Provide indication device is assigned by KVM */
> > > > > > > > +       PCI_DEV_FLAGS_ASSIGNED = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) 4,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We can resubmit with a more generic comment, maybe this:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* Provide indication device is assigned by a Virtual Machine
> > Manager */
> > > > >
> > > > > Sounds good to me.
> > > >
> > > > Dave, Jeff,
> > > >
> > > > Should I resubmit the patch or would it be more convenient to post a
> > follow on patch that fixes up the comment?  Either way is fine by me.
> > > >
> > > > - Greg
> > > >
> > >
> > > let's fix up the patch in my tree and add Jesse Barnes's ACK at the same
> > > time.
> > 
> > Were are the patches now? I am kind of curious to see the changes to the
> > xen pciback.
> > 
> > 
> 
> Version 2 of this patch with the modified comment was just posted to netdev.  Ian Campbell had mentioned that the Xen pciback driver should be modified to use this flag but I don't believe any patches for it have been created yet.

http://marc.info/?i=20110729165446.GA6731@xxxxxxxxxxxx

?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux