Re: [PATCH] PCI: apple: Fix REFCLK1 enable/poll logic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/12/2021 01.49, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 05:56:12PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 14:00:44 +0000,
Hector Martin <marcan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

REFCLK1 has req/ack bits just like REFCLK0

Signed-off-by: Hector Martin <marcan@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c | 7 ++++---
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c
index b665d29af77a..420c291a5c68 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c
@@ -42,8 +42,9 @@
  #define   CORE_FABRIC_STAT_MASK		0x001F001F
  #define CORE_LANE_CFG(port)		(0x84000 + 0x4000 * (port))
  #define   CORE_LANE_CFG_REFCLK0REQ	BIT(0)
-#define   CORE_LANE_CFG_REFCLK1		BIT(1)
+#define   CORE_LANE_CFG_REFCLK1REQ	BIT(1)
  #define   CORE_LANE_CFG_REFCLK0ACK	BIT(2)
+#define   CORE_LANE_CFG_REFCLK1ACK	BIT(3)
  #define   CORE_LANE_CFG_REFCLKEN	(BIT(9) | BIT(10))
  #define CORE_LANE_CTL(port)		(0x84004 + 0x4000 * (port))
  #define   CORE_LANE_CTL_CFGACC		BIT(15)
@@ -481,9 +482,9 @@ static int apple_pcie_setup_refclk(struct apple_pcie *pcie,
  	if (res < 0)
  		return res;
- rmw_set(CORE_LANE_CFG_REFCLK1, pcie->base + CORE_LANE_CFG(port->idx));
+	rmw_set(CORE_LANE_CFG_REFCLK1REQ, pcie->base + CORE_LANE_CFG(port->idx));
  	res = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(pcie->base + CORE_LANE_CFG(port->idx),
-					 stat, stat & CORE_LANE_CFG_REFCLK1,
+					 stat, stat & CORE_LANE_CFG_REFCLK1ACK,
  					 100, 50000);
if (res < 0)
--
2.33.0



Fixes: 1e33888fbe44 ("PCI: apple: Add initial hardware bring-up")
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Hector, Bjorn,

if this is a fix we can aim at one of the upcoming -rcX.

It would be nicer though to explain a bit better what it is
fixing in the commit log (and what's broken if we don't merge it),
as it stands it is a bit terse.

I don't think anything is broken per se, it still works without this patch (probably because the refclk gets enabled fast enough that we don't have to wait for it); it's just that I think this is the correct logic. This is all reverse engineered anyway, so ultimately there is no hardware documentation to point to to say what's right and what's wrong...

--
Hector Martin (marcan@xxxxxxxxx)
Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux