On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:37:27PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:20 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 1:06 PM Heikki Krogerus > > <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:33:27AM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > If the device is really never removed, then we could also constify the > > > node and the properties in it. Then the patch would look like this: > > > > I'm not sure the user can't force removal of the device (via PCI > > rescan, for example,, or via unbind/bind cycle). > > The sysfs unbind doesn't remove the device, though, AFAICS. It just > unbinds the driver from it, if any. > > > I guess this way should be really taken carefully. > > But I agree. OK. Makes sense. Thanks guys, -- heikki
