I like the patch; thanks for doing this for the last instance in
drivers/pci/.
If you repost, remove some words from the subject line, e.g.,
befa45fb5bdd ("PCI: Use devm_add_action_or_reset()")
Yes, I'm OCD enough to look through the git history for similar
previous commits and make new changes match :)
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 09:00:08PM +0800, Cai Huoqing wrote:
> The helper function devm_add_action_or_reset() will internally
> call devm_add_action(), and if devm_add_action() fails then it will
> execute the action mentioned and return the error code. So
> use devm_add_action_or_reset() instead of devm_add_action()
> to simplify the error handling, reduce the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> index ed13e81cd691..cd387f235b7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> @@ -897,11 +897,9 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_parse_port(struct mvebu_pcie *pcie,
> goto skip;
> }
>
> - ret = devm_add_action(dev, mvebu_pcie_port_clk_put, port);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - clk_put(port->clk);
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, mvebu_pcie_port_clk_put, port);
> + if (ret < 0)
> goto err;
> - }
Unrelated note: this function does things like this:
if (...) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto err;
}
...
err:
return ret;
which I think is pointless. There's no cleanup to be done at "err",
so these places could simply "return -ENOMEM" instead, which is much
easier to read.
And this:
if (reset_gpio == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
ret = reset_gpio;
goto err;
}
Should say:
if (reset_gpio == -EPROBE_DEFER)
return -EPROBE_DEFER;
since we know the value we're returning.
Obviously this would be something for a different patch.
> return 1;
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
