On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 04:46:54PM -0700, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote: > On Wed, 15 Sep 2021, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 09:16:47AM -0700, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 Sep 2021, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > > > > In an earlier mail in this thread was stated that subvendor id is unknown. > > > > Checking here https://pcisig.com/membership/member-companies?combine=1dcf > > > > it says: Beijing Sinead Technology Co., Ltd. > > > > > > Huh. I didn't realize there was an official list beyond pciids.ucw.cz. > > > > > > In any case, that's who you need to talk to about the unlisted (to > > > Linux) vendor ID and also the odd VPD data. > > > > https://pci-ids.ucw.cz/ is definitely unofficial in the sense that it > > is basically crowd-sourced data, not the "official" Vendor IDs > > controlled by the PCI SIG. > > > > I submitted an addition to https://pci-ids.ucw.cz/ > > > > Bjorn > > Just for my edumacation, do they keep track of device IDs, subvendor IDs > (which are probably just the same as vendor IDs), and subdevice IDs in > the PCI SIG? Or even the branding strings? The PCI SIG does not manage Device IDs. That's the responsibility of the vendor.
