Re: [PATCH] x86/intel: Disable HPET on another Intel Coffee Lake platform

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 08:30:42AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:07:07 -0500 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 06:17:39AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > My Lenovo T490s with i7-8665U had been marking TSC as unstable
> > > since v5.13, resulting in very sluggish desktop experience...  
> > 
> > Including the actual dmesg log line here might help others locate this
> > fix.
> 
> Good point, will add in v2.
> 
> clocksource: timekeeping watchdog on CPU3: hpet read-back delay of 316000ns, attempt 4, marking unstable
> tsc: Marking TSC unstable due to clocksource watchdog
> TSC found unstable after boot, most likely due to broken BIOS. Use 'tsc=unstable'.
> sched_clock: Marking unstable (14539801827657, -530891666)<-(14539319241737, -48307500)
> clocksource: Checking clocksource tsc synchronization from CPU 3 to CPUs 0-2,6-7.
> clocksource: Switched to clocksource hpet
> 
> > > I have a 8086:3e34 bridge, also known as "Host bridge: Intel
> > > Corporation Coffee Lake HOST and DRAM Controller (rev 0c)".
> > > Add it to the list.
> > > 
> > > We should perhaps consider applying this quirk more widely.
> > > The Intel documentation does not list my device [1], but
> > > linuxhw [2] does, and it seems to list a few more bridges
> > > we do not currently cover (3e31, 3ecc, 3e35, 3e0f).  
> > 
> > In the fine tradition of:
> > 
> >   e0748539e3d5 ("x86/intel: Disable HPET on Intel Ice Lake platforms")
> >   f8edbde885bb ("x86/intel: Disable HPET on Intel Coffee Lake H platforms")
> >   fc5db58539b4 ("x86/quirks: Disable HPET on Intel Coffe Lake platforms")
> >   62187910b0fc ("x86/intel: Add quirk to disable HPET for the Baytrail plat form")
> > 
> > This seems to be an ongoing issue, not just a point defect in a single
> > product, and I really hate the onesy-twosy nature of this.
> 
> Indeed. Or at least cover all Coffee Lakes in one fell swoop.
> 
> > Is there really no way to detect this issue automatically or fix
> > whatever Linux bug makes us trip over this?  I am no clock expert, so
> > I have absolutely no idea whether this is possible.
> 
> I'm deferring to clock experts. Paul mentioned he has some prototype
> patches that may help.
> 
> > > [1] https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/8th-gen-core-family-datasheet-vol-2.pdf
> > > [2] https://github.com/linuxhw/DevicePopulation/blob/master/README.md
> > > 
> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v5.13+  
> > 
> > How did you pick v5.13?  force_disable_hpet() was added by
> > 62187910b0fc ("x86/intel: Add quirk to disable HPET for the Baytrail
> > platform"), which appeared in v3.15.
> 
> Erm, good question, it started happening for me (and others with the
> same laptop) with v5.13. I just sort of assumed it was 2e27e793e280
> ("clocksource: Reduce clocksource-skew threshold"). 
> 
> It usually takes  a day to repro (4 hours was the quickest repro I've
> seen) so bisection was kind of out of question.

OK, so this is an intermittent condition where HPET is sometimes slow to
access for a short period of time?  If that is the case, my thought is
to set the clocksource to be reinitialized (without a splat and without
marking the clocksource unstable), and to splat (and mark the clocksource
unstable) if it is not get a good read after 100 subsequent attempts.

So as long as the period of slowness lasts for less than 50 seconds,
things would work fine.

Seem reasonable?

							Thanx, Paul




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux