On 13.09.2021 22:32, Dave Jones wrote: + Jesse and Tony as Intel NIC maintainers > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 10:22:57PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > > > > This didn't help I'm afraid :( > > > It changed the VPD warning, but that's about it... > > > > > > [ 184.235496] pci 0000:02:00.0: calling quirk_blacklist_vpd+0x0/0x22 @ 1 > > > [ 184.235499] pci 0000:02:00.0: [Firmware Bug]: disabling VPD access (can't determine size of non-standard VPD format) > > > [ 184.235501] pci 0000:02:00.0: quirk_blacklist_vpd+0x0/0x22 took 0 usecs > > > > > With this patch there's no VPD access to this device any longer. So this can't be > > the root cause. Do you have any other PCI device that has VPD capability? > > -> Capabilities: [...] Vital Product Data > > > 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01) > Subsystem: Device 1dcf:030a > ... > Capabilities: [e0] Vital Product Data > Unknown small resource type 06, will not decode more. > When searching I found the same symptom of invalid VPD data for 82599EB. Do these adapters have non-VPD data in VPD address space? Or is the actual VPD data at another offset than 0? I know that few Chelsio devices have such a non-standard VPD structure. > > I'll add that to the quirk list and see if that helps. > > Dave > Heiner
