On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:07:46 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Some discussion was under "PCI: fix cardbus and sriov regressions", > > which includes a patchset as well. Oliver Hartkopp's problem is the one > > that worries me most. The SR-IOV issue is really a BIOS bug and > > unlikely to affect many people anyway (SR-IOV is really a big server > > feature). > > Ouch. That is much bigger than I was hoping for. Especially that > second patch doesn't look like some -rc5 candidate. > > And the fact that Oliver then at the end shows an impossibly aligned > resource shows that it clearly isn't even remotely correct even AFTER > the patches, so that doesn't make me get all warm and fuzzy either. > > So I guess we should just revert again. How about a boot param? We've done similar things for _CRS, and it might give Yinghai and Ram some more flexibility in improving our dynamic resource allocation before enabling it again (if ever). Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
