Re: [PATCH V3 06/13] vfio/pci: Split the pci_driver code out of vfio_pci_core.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 8/23/2021 6:16 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 17:35:55 +0300
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..15474ebadd98
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
...
+static int vfio_pci_sriov_configure(struct pci_dev *pdev, int nr_virtfn)
+{
+	might_sleep();
+
+	if (!enable_sriov)
+		return -ENOENT;
+
+	return vfio_pci_core_sriov_configure(pdev, nr_virtfn);
+}
As noted in previous version, why do we need the might_sleep() above
when the core code below includes it and there's nothing above that
might sleep before that?  Thanks,

This is used to mention vfio_pci_core_sriov_configure might sleep.

If this is redundant, can you please remove this one line upon merge ?


Alex

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
index 94f062818e0c..87d1960d0d61 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
...
-static int vfio_pci_sriov_configure(struct pci_dev *pdev, int nr_virtfn)
+int vfio_pci_core_sriov_configure(struct pci_dev *pdev, int nr_virtfn)
  {
  	struct vfio_device *device;
  	int ret = 0;
might_sleep(); - if (!enable_sriov)
-		return -ENOENT;
-
  	device = vfio_device_get_from_dev(&pdev->dev);
  	if (!device)
  		return -ENODEV;



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux