On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 11:53:55PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > The check for irq_managed flag along with non-zero irq is an idiom > for x86 PCI implementation. Introduce helper and switch users over > using it. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h | 4 ++++ > arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c | 5 ++--- > arch/x86/pci/irq.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c | 4 ++-- > 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h > index d2c76c8d8cfd..ac25470c9558 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h > @@ -92,6 +92,10 @@ void pcibios_scan_root(int bus); > struct irq_routing_table *pcibios_get_irq_routing_table(void); > int pcibios_set_irq_routing(struct pci_dev *dev, int pin, int irq); > > +static inline bool pcibios_irq_is_managed(struct pci_dev *dev) > +{ > + return dev->irq_managed && dev->irq > 0; > +} > > #define HAVE_PCI_MMAP > #define arch_can_pci_mmap_wc() pat_enabled() > diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c b/arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c > index f04742caf62b..0da287bcabf5 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c > +++ b/arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c > @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static int intel_mid_pci_irq_enable(struct pci_dev *dev) > int ret; > u8 gsi; > > - if (dev->irq_managed && dev->irq > 0) > + if (pcibios_irq_is_managed(dev)) > return 0; > > ret = pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, &gsi); > @@ -290,8 +290,7 @@ static int intel_mid_pci_irq_enable(struct pci_dev *dev) > > static void intel_mid_pci_irq_disable(struct pci_dev *dev) > { > - if (!mp_should_keep_irq(&dev->dev) && dev->irq_managed && > - dev->irq > 0) { > + if (pcibios_irq_is_managed(dev) && !mp_should_keep_irq(&dev->dev)) { > mp_unmap_irq(dev->irq); > dev->irq_managed = 0; > } > diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/irq.c b/arch/x86/pci/irq.c > index d3a73f9335e1..ce3927b68f9e 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/pci/irq.c > +++ b/arch/x86/pci/irq.c > @@ -1210,7 +1210,7 @@ static int pirq_enable_irq(struct pci_dev *dev) > struct pci_dev *temp_dev; > int irq; > > - if (dev->irq_managed && dev->irq > 0) > + if (pcibios_irq_is_managed(dev)) > return 0; > > irq = IO_APIC_get_PCI_irq_vector(dev->bus->number, > @@ -1280,7 +1280,7 @@ bool mp_should_keep_irq(struct device *dev) > static void pirq_disable_irq(struct pci_dev *dev) > { > if (io_apic_assign_pci_irqs && !mp_should_keep_irq(&dev->dev) && > - dev->irq_managed && dev->irq) { > + pcibios_irq_is_managed(dev)) { > mp_unmap_irq(dev->irq); > dev->irq = 0; > dev->irq_managed = 0; > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c > index b63954c36e86..b463bdd2dbb5 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c > @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ int __acpi_pci_irq_enable(struct pci_dev *dev, int polarity) > return 0; > } > > - if (dev->irq_managed && dev->irq > 0) > + if (pcibios_irq_is_managed(dev)) > return 0; > > entry = acpi_pci_irq_lookup(dev, pin); > @@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ void acpi_pci_irq_disable(struct pci_dev *dev) > u8 pin; > > pin = dev->pin; > - if (!pin || !dev->irq_managed || dev->irq <= 0) > + if (!pin || !pcibios_irq_is_managed(dev)) This file may be compiled for x86, arm64, and ia64, but it looks like you only defined pcibios_irq_is_managed() for x86. We used to have a generic pci_has_managed_irq() that was the same as your pcibios_irq_is_managed(), but it was removed by 67b4eab91caf ("Revert "PCI: Add helpers to manage pci_dev->irq and pci_dev->irq_managed""). I'm sorry that pdev->irq_managed got added without a comment by cffe0a2b5a34 ("x86, irq: Keep balance of IOAPIC pin reference count"). Even reading that commit log, I'm not sure exactly what it means. The log says: So flag irq_managed is introduced to track whether IRQ number is assigned by OS and to protect pirq_enable_irq(), acpi_pci_irq_enable() and intel_mid_pci_irq_enable() from reentrance. > return; > > /* Keep IOAPIC pin configuration when suspending */ > -- > 2.30.2 >