On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:05:05 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 11:47 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > > So basically an arch hook in place of a quirk for everything? Yeah > > that's probably clearer, and maybe there's some code in a catch all > > quirk that could be moved there on other arches as well. > > Hrm, quick vs hook ... that's orthogonal. > > But we don't have a quick today that is called before we start poking at > the slot with config space, do we ? > > We can't do quirk until we have some sort of pci_dev around right ? Well I thought an early quirk might be good enough for this, since it occurs before we go poking at BARs. But either way, an arch hook for arch stuff is more self-documenting. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
