On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 3:31 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 00:18:48 +0100, > Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 10:32:00AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > The Apple PCIe host controller is a PCIe host controller with > > > multiple root ports present in Apple ARM SoC platforms, including > > > various iPhone and iPad devices and the "Apple Silicon" Macs. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > .../devicetree/bindings/pci/apple,pcie.yaml | 166 ++++++++++++++++++ > > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > > 2 files changed, 167 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/apple,pcie.yaml > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/apple,pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/apple,pcie.yaml > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 000000000000..bfcbdee79c64 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/apple,pcie.yaml > > > @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > > +%YAML 1.2 > > > +--- > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pci/apple,pcie.yaml# > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > > + > > > +title: Apple PCIe host controller > > > + > > > +maintainers: > > > + - Mark Kettenis <kettenis@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > + > > > +description: | > > > + The Apple PCIe host controller is a PCIe host controller with > > > + multiple root ports present in Apple ARM SoC platforms, including > > > + various iPhone and iPad devices and the "Apple Silicon" Macs. > > > + The controller incorporates Synopsys DesigWare PCIe logic to > > > + implements its root ports. But the ATU found on most DesignWare > > > + PCIe host bridges is absent. > > > > blank line > > > > > + All root ports share a single ECAM space, but separate GPIOs are > > > + used to take the PCI devices on those ports out of reset. Therefore > > > + the standard "reset-gpio" and "max-link-speed" properties appear on > > > > reset-gpios > > > > > + the child nodes that represent the PCI bridges that correspond to > > > + the individual root ports. > > > > blank line > > > > > + MSIs are handled by the PCIe controller and translated into regular > > > + interrupts. A range of 32 MSIs is provided. These 32 MSIs can be > > > + distributed over the root ports as the OS sees fit by programming > > > + the PCIe controller's port registers. > > > + > > > +allOf: > > > + - $ref: /schemas/pci/pci-bus.yaml# > > > + > > > +properties: > > > + compatible: > > > + items: > > > + - const: apple,t8103-pcie > > > + - const: apple,pcie > > > + > > > + reg: > > > + minItems: 3 > > > + maxItems: 5 > > > + > > > + reg-names: > > > + minItems: 3 > > > + maxItems: 5 > > > + items: > > > + - const: config > > > + - const: rc > > > + - const: port0 > > > + - const: port1 > > > + - const: port2 > > > + > > > + ranges: > > > + minItems: 2 > > > + maxItems: 2 > > > + > > > + interrupts: > > > + description: > > > + Interrupt specifiers, one for each root port. > > > + minItems: 1 > > > + maxItems: 3 > > > + > > > + msi-controller: true > > > + msi-parent: true > > > + > > > + msi-ranges: > > > + description: > > > + A list of pairs <intid span>, where "intid" is the first > > > + interrupt number that can be used as an MSI, and "span" the size > > > + of that range. > > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-matrix > > > + items: > > > + minItems: 2 > > > + maxItems: 2 > > > > I still have issues I raised on v1 with this property. It's genericish > > looking, but not generic. 'intid' as a single cell can't specify any > > parent interrupt such as a GIC which uses 3 cells. You could put in all > > the cells, but you'd still be assuming which cell you can increment. > > The GIC bindings already use similar abstractions, see what we do for > both GICv2m and GICv3 MBIs. Other MSI controllers use similar > properties (alpine and loongson, for example). That's the problem. Everyone making up their own crap. > > I think you should just list all these under 'interrupts' using > > interrupt-names to make your life easier: > > > > interrupt-names: > > items: > > - const: port0 > > - const: port1 > > - const: port2 > > - const: msi0 > > - const: msi1 > > - const: msi2 > > - const: msi3 > > ... > > > > Yeah, it's kind of verbose, but if the h/w block handles N interrupts, > > you should list N interrupts. The worst case for the above is N entries > > too if not contiguous. > > And that's where I beg to differ, again. > > Specifying interrupts like this gives the false impression that these > interrupts are generated by the device that owns them (the RC). Which > for MSIs is not the case. It's no different than an interrupt controller node having an interrupts property. The source is downstream and the interrupt controller is combining/translating the interrupts. The physical interrupt signals are connected to and originating in this block. That sounds like perfectly 'describing the h/w' to me. > This is not only verbose, this is > semantically dubious. And what should we do when the number of > possible interrupt is ridiculously large, as it is for the GICv3 ITS? I don't disagree with the verbose part. But that's not really an issue in this case. > I wish we had a standard way to express these constraints. Until we > do, I don't think enumerating individual interrupts is a practical > thing to do, nor that it actually represents the topology of the > system. The only way a standard way will happen is to stop accepting the custom properties. All the custom properties suffer from knowledge of what the parent interrupt controller is. To fix that, I think we need something like this: msi-ranges = <intspec base>, <intspec step>, <intspec end>; 'intspec' is defined by the parent interrupt-controller cells. step is the value to add. And end is what to match on to stop aka the last interrupt in the range. For example, if the GIC is the parent, we'd have something like this: <GIC_SPI 123 0>, <0 1 0>, <GIC_SPI 124 0> Does this apply to cases other than MSI? I think so as don't we have the same type of properties with the low power mode shadow interrupt controllers? So 'interrupt-ranges'? It looks to me like there's an assumption in the kernel that an MSI controller has a linear range of parent interrupts? Is that correct and something that's guaranteed? That assumption leaks into the existing bindings. It's fine for the kernel to assume that until there's a case that's not linear, but a common binding needs to be able handle a non-linear case. Rob
