On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 16:15 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > I think I'd vote for saving some kind of representation of the bus > hierarchy, we probably don't need to list every possible individual > device. Leaving a broken pointer around to be matched up and restored > later just seems like a continuation of an idea that was bad to begin > with. Thanks, I agree. We should just process the original ATSR information in dmar_find_matched_drhd_unit(), rather than comparing with a list of possibly stale pointers. I don't quite understand why the list of PCI devices was *ever* done like that. -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx Intel Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
