Yes - I got this one wrong.
Nevermind, looks good. Just the punctuation NIT.
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 05:36:26PM -0500, Shanker R Donthineni wrote:
> Hi Raphael,
>
> On 6/9/21 4:57 PM, Raphael Norwitz wrote:
> >> +static ssize_t reset_method_show(struct device *dev,
> >> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> >> + char *buf)
> >> +{
> >> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> >> + ssize_t len = 0;
> >> + int i, prio;
> >> +
> >> + for (prio = PCI_RESET_METHODS_NUM; prio; prio--) {
> >> + for (i = 0; i < PCI_RESET_METHODS_NUM; i++) {
> >> + if (prio == pdev->reset_methods[i]) {
> >> + len += sysfs_emit_at(buf, len, "%s%s",
> >> + len ? "," : "",
> >> + pci_reset_fn_methods[i].name);
> >> + break;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (i == PCI_RESET_METHODS_NUM)
> >> + break;
> >> + }
> >> +
> > Don't you still need to ensure you add the newline even if there are no
> > reset methods set? If the len is zero why don't we need the newline?
> >
> > Otherwise looks good.
> >
>
> sysfs entry 'reset_method' will not be visible if there are no reset methods.
>
>
