On Thu, 12 May 2011 11:22:29 -0700 Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:14:07AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > I like this approach than the earlier approach because it > > > closes the subtle bug _introduced_ by my earlier patch, > > > commit c8adf9a3e873eddaaec11ac410a99ef6b9656938 > > > > > > However i think the implementation can be made cleaner. Comments below.. > > > > Ack on all of that. Do we have confirmation that the patch works, though? > > In theory it should work. But I have not tested it yet. I will work with Yinghai and > have a cleaned-up/working/tested patch your way soon. Linus, I don't have anything else queued up, so you may as well take this one directly if you want it in 2.6.39. It's a regression fix, but resource changes always make me nervous. Alternately, I could put it into 2.6.40 instead, the backport to 2.6.39.x if it survives until 2.6.40-rc2 or so... Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
