On Monday 31 May 2021 15:39:55 Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > Hi Pali, > > Thanks for your comments. > > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 3:14 PM Pali Rohár <pali@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Saturday 15 May 2021 14:40:53 Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > > > This patch adds a driver for the PCIe controller of MT7621 SoC. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > arch/mips/pci/Makefile | 1 + > > > arch/mips/pci/pci-mt7621.c | 624 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > arch/mips/ralink/Kconfig | 9 +- > > > 3 files changed, 633 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > create mode 100644 arch/mips/pci/pci-mt7621.c > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/mips/pci/Makefile b/arch/mips/pci/Makefile > > > index f3eecc065e5c..178c550739c4 100644 > > > --- a/arch/mips/pci/Makefile > > > +++ b/arch/mips/pci/Makefile > > > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_AR2315) += pci-ar2315.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_AR71XX) += pci-ar71xx.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_AR724X) += pci-ar724x.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_XTALK_BRIDGE) += pci-xtalk-bridge.o > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MT7621) += pci-mt7621.o > > > # > > > # These are still pretty much in the old state, watch, go blind. > > > # > > > diff --git a/arch/mips/pci/pci-mt7621.c b/arch/mips/pci/pci-mt7621.c > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 000000000000..fe1945819d25 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/arch/mips/pci/pci-mt7621.c > > ... > > > +static int mt7621_pcie_enable_ports(struct mt7621_pcie *pcie) > > > +{ > > > + struct device *dev = pcie->dev; > > > + struct mt7621_pcie_port *port; > > > + u8 num_slots_enabled = 0; > > > + u32 slot; > > > + u32 val; > > > + int err; > > > + > > > + /* Setup MEMWIN and IOWIN */ > > > + pcie_write(pcie, 0xffffffff, RALINK_PCI_MEMBASE); > > > + pcie_write(pcie, pcie->io.start, RALINK_PCI_IOBASE); > > > + > > > + list_for_each_entry(port, &pcie->ports, list) { > > > + if (port->enabled) { > > > + err = clk_prepare_enable(port->clk); > > > + if (err) { > > > + dev_err(dev, "enabling clk pcie%d\n", slot); > > > + return err; > > > + } > > > + > > > + mt7621_pcie_enable_port(port); > > > + dev_info(dev, "PCIE%d enabled\n", port->slot); > > > + num_slots_enabled++; > > > + } > > > + } > > > + > > > + for (slot = 0; slot < num_slots_enabled; slot++) { > > > + val = read_config(pcie, slot, PCI_COMMAND); > > > + val |= PCI_COMMAND_MASTER; > > > + write_config(pcie, slot, PCI_COMMAND, val); > > > > Hello! Is this part of code correct? Because it looks strange if PCIe > > controller driver automatically enables PCI bus mastering, prior device > > driver initialize itself. > > > > Moreover kernel has already function pci_set_master() for this purpose > > which is used by device drivers. > > > > So I think this code can confuse some device drivers... > > I agree that we have pci_set_master() to be used in pci device driver > code. Original controller driver set this bit for enabled slots. Since > there is no documentation at all for the PCI in this SoC I see... this is really a big problem to do any driver development... > I have > maintained the setting in the driver in a cleaner way. See original > driver code and the setting here [0]. There is no other reason than > that. I am ok with removing this from here and testing with my two > devices that everything is still ok if having this setting in the pci > controller driver is a real problem. You can run lspci -nnvv with and without PCI_COMMAND_MASTER code and then compare outputs. Device drivers for sure enable PCI_COMMAND_MASTER at the time when it is needed, so it is possible that there would be no difference in lspci output. > [0]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git/tree/drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c?h=v4.18#n676 > > Best regards, > Sergio Paracuellos > > > > > + /* configure RC FTS number to 250 when it leaves L0s */ > > > + val = read_config(pcie, slot, PCIE_FTS_NUM); > > > + val &= ~PCIE_FTS_NUM_MASK; > > > + val |= PCIE_FTS_NUM_L0(0x50); > > > + write_config(pcie, slot, PCIE_FTS_NUM, val); > > > + } > > > + > > > + return 0; > > > +}