On 05/09/2011 02:35 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Sun, 08 May 2011 11:54:32 -0700 > Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> Need to use it in _e1000e_disable_aspm. >> when aer happens, >> pci_walk_bus already have down_read(&pci_bus_sem)... >> then report_slot_reset >> ==> e1000_io_slot_reset >> ==> e1000e_disable_aspm >> ==> pci_disable_link_state... >> >> We can not use pci_disable_link_state, and it will try to hold pci_bus_sem again. >> >> Try to have __pci_disable_link_state that will not need to hold pci_bus_sem. > > What about the other callers of e1000e_disable_aspm? Do they already > have the lock held or is it just reset that needs the already locked > version? yes. there is another version when aspm is not defined. and it does not use any lock. #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM static void __e1000e_disable_aspm(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 state) { pci_disable_link_state(pdev, state); } #else static void __e1000e_disable_aspm(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 state) { int pos; u16 reg16; /* * Both device and parent should have the same ASPM setting. * Disable ASPM in downstream component first and then upstream. */ pos = pci_pcie_cap(pdev); pci_read_config_word(pdev, pos + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, ®16); reg16 &= ~state; pci_write_config_word(pdev, pos + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, reg16); if (!pdev->bus->self) return; pos = pci_pcie_cap(pdev->bus->self); pci_read_config_word(pdev->bus->self, pos + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, ®16); reg16 &= ~state; pci_write_config_word(pdev->bus->self, pos + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, reg16); } #endif > >> +extern void __pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state); >> extern void pcie_clear_aspm(void); >> extern void pcie_no_aspm(void); >> #else > > pci_disable_link_state_locked would be more descriptive and would match > other usage in the kernel. ok. Thanks Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html