On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:42:02PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote: > struct io_tlb_mem *io_tlb_default_mem; > +static struct dentry *debugfs_dir; > > /* > * Max segment that we can provide which (if pages are contingous) will > @@ -662,18 +663,30 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_swiotlb_active); > > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS > > +static void swiotlb_create_debugfs(struct io_tlb_mem *mem, const char *name) > { > if (!mem) > + return; I don't think this check makes much sense here. > +} > + > +static int __init swiotlb_create_default_debugfs(void) > +{ > + struct io_tlb_mem *mem = io_tlb_default_mem; > + > + if (mem) { > + swiotlb_create_debugfs(mem, "swiotlb"); > + debugfs_dir = mem->debugfs; > + } else { > + debugfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir("swiotlb", NULL); > + } This also looks rather strange. I'd much rather create move the directory creation of out swiotlb_create_debugfs. E.g. something like: static void swiotlb_create_debugfs_file(struct io_tlb_mem *mem) { debugfs_create_ulong("io_tlb_nslabs", 0400, mem->debugfs, &mem->nslabs); debugfs_create_ulong("io_tlb_used", 0400, mem->debugfs, &mem->used); } static int __init swiotlb_init_debugfs(void) { debugfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir("swiotlb", NULL); if (io_tlb_default_mem) { io_tlb_default_mem->debugfs = debugfs_dir; swiotlb_create_debugfs_files(io_tlb_default_mem); } return 0; } late_initcall(swiotlb_init_debugfs); ... static int rmem_swiotlb_device_init(struct reserved_mem *rmem, struct device *dev) { ... mem->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(rmem->name, debugfs_dir); swiotlb_create_debugfs_files(mem->debugfs); }