Re: [PATCH v7 02/15] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_create_debugfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:42:02PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote:
>  struct io_tlb_mem *io_tlb_default_mem;
> +static struct dentry *debugfs_dir;
>  
>  /*
>   * Max segment that we can provide which (if pages are contingous) will
> @@ -662,18 +663,30 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_swiotlb_active);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
>  
> +static void swiotlb_create_debugfs(struct io_tlb_mem *mem, const char *name)
>  {
>  	if (!mem)
> +		return;

I don't think this check makes much sense here.

> +}
> +
> +static int __init swiotlb_create_default_debugfs(void)
> +{
> +	struct io_tlb_mem *mem = io_tlb_default_mem;
> +
> +	if (mem) {
> +		swiotlb_create_debugfs(mem, "swiotlb");
> +		debugfs_dir = mem->debugfs;
> +	} else {
> +		debugfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir("swiotlb", NULL);
> +	}

This also looks rather strange.  I'd much rather create move the
directory creation of out swiotlb_create_debugfs.  E.g. something like:

static void swiotlb_create_debugfs_file(struct io_tlb_mem *mem)
{
	debugfs_create_ulong("io_tlb_nslabs", 0400, mem->debugfs, &mem->nslabs);
	debugfs_create_ulong("io_tlb_used", 0400, mem->debugfs, &mem->used);
}

static int __init swiotlb_init_debugfs(void)
{
	debugfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir("swiotlb", NULL);
	if (io_tlb_default_mem) {
		io_tlb_default_mem->debugfs = debugfs_dir;
		swiotlb_create_debugfs_files(io_tlb_default_mem);
	}
	return 0;
}
late_initcall(swiotlb_init_debugfs);

...

static int rmem_swiotlb_device_init(struct reserved_mem *rmem,
                                    struct device *dev)
{
	...
		mem->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(rmem->name, debugfs_dir);
		swiotlb_create_debugfs_files(mem->debugfs);

			
}



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux