On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 05:08:42PM +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: > On Fri, 2021-05-07 at 08:30 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 12:07:38AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > > On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 04:48:42PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 08:38:20PM +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: > > > > > On Macbook 2013 resuming from s2idle results in external monitor no > > > > > longer being detected, and dmesg having errors like: > > > > > > > > > > pcieport 0000:06:00.0: can't change power state from D3hot to D0 > > > > > (config space inaccessible) > > > > > > > > > > and a stacktrace. The reason turned out that the hw that the quirk > > > > > powers off does not get powered on back on resume. > > For example, "With s2idle, the machine isn't suspended via ACPI, so > > the AML code which powers the controller off isn't executed." AFAICT > > that isn't actually a required, documented property of s2idle, but > > rather it reaches into the internal implementation. > > The code comment "If suspend mode is s2idle, power won't get restored > > on resume" is similar. !pm_suspend_via_firmware() tells us that > > platform firmware won't be invoked. But the connection between *that* > > and "power won't get restored" is unexplained. > > Sorry, I can't comment anything regarding AML and power management > in general since I am really new to all of this. However, regarding > the usage of the `pm_suspend_via_firmware()`: yeah, I also think it > is unclear what this does, and I was thinking about adding a wrapper > function something like `is_s2idle()` to the suspend.h, which would > simply call `pm_suspend_via_firmware` internally. No, that's not my point at all. I don't really care whether the interface is called pm_suspend_via_firmware() or is_s2idle(). What I don't like about this is that it's all just unexplained magic, as was the original quirk. IIUC, the quirk is applied by pci_pm_suspend_noirq() *after* it puts the device in a low-power state. Here's my uninformed speculation about what happens: - On suspend, pci_pm_suspend_noirq() puts device in low-power state. My *guess* is this means D0 or D3hot for s2idle, and D3cold for everything else. [Do we have sufficient debug to find out what these states are?] - pci_pm_suspend_noirq() does pci_fixup_suspend_late fixups, including quirk_apple_poweroff_thunderbolt(). - quirk_apple_poweroff_thunderbolt() runs the magic SXIO/SXFP/SXLF methods, which apparently turn off more power. - On resume, pci_pm_resume_noirq() brings the device back to D0. If we're resuming from standby, S2RAM, or STD, I speculate the device is in D3cold, so this involves running AML that seems to undo whatever SXIO/SXFP/SXLF did. If we're resuming from s2idle, I speculate the device is in D0 or D3hot, and we run different AML (or maybe no AML at all), and we *don't* undo the effects of SXIO/SXFP/SXLF, so the device doesn't work. If the above is anything like what's happening, we should be able to skip SXIO/SXFP/SXLF based on the current power state of the device. E.g., if the device is in D0 or D3hot, we should not use SXIO/SXFP/SXLF to yank power. That would seem more connected to the observable state of the device than using pm_suspend_via_firmware(), which relies on the connection between s2idle and PM_SUSPEND_FLAG_FW_SUSPEND (which is not at all obvious) and the power state of the device while in s2idle (also not obvious). Bjorn