The conversion tools used during DocBook/LaTeX/Markdown->ReST conversion and some automatic rules which exists on certain text editors like LibreOffice turned ASCII characters into some UTF-8 alternatives that are better displayed on html and PDF. While it is OK to use UTF-8 characters in Linux, it is better to use the ASCII subset instead of using an UTF-8 equivalent character as it makes life easier for tools like grep, and are easier to edit with the some commonly used text/source code editors. Also, Sphinx already do such conversion automatically outside literal blocks: https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/user/smartquotes.html So, replace the occurences of the following UTF-8 characters: - U+00a0 (' '): NO-BREAK SPACE - U+2019 ('’'): RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/PCI/acpi-info.rst | 22 +++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/PCI/acpi-info.rst b/Documentation/PCI/acpi-info.rst index 060217081c79..30d0fc85dd8e 100644 --- a/Documentation/PCI/acpi-info.rst +++ b/Documentation/PCI/acpi-info.rst @@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ or if the device has INTx interrupts connected by platform interrupt controllers and a _PRT is needed to describe those connections. ACPI resource description is done via _CRS objects of devices in the ACPI -namespace [2]. The _CRS is like a generalized PCI BAR: the OS can read +namespace [2]. The _CRS is like a generalized PCI BAR: the OS can read _CRS and figure out what resource is being consumed even if it doesn't have -a driver for the device [3]. That's important because it means an old OS +a driver for the device [3]. That's important because it means an old OS can work correctly even on a system with new devices unknown to the OS. The new devices might not do anything, but the OS can at least make sure no resources conflict with them. @@ -41,15 +41,15 @@ ACPI, that device will have a specific _HID/_CID that tells the OS what driver to bind to it, and the _CRS tells the OS and the driver where the device's registers are. -PCI host bridges are PNP0A03 or PNP0A08 devices. Their _CRS should -describe all the address space they consume. This includes all the windows +PCI host bridges are PNP0A03 or PNP0A08 devices. Their _CRS should +describe all the address space they consume. This includes all the windows they forward down to the PCI bus, as well as registers of the host bridge -itself that are not forwarded to PCI. The host bridge registers include +itself that are not forwarded to PCI. The host bridge registers include things like secondary/subordinate bus registers that determine the bus range below the bridge, window registers that describe the apertures, etc. These are all device-specific, non-architected things, so the only way a PNP0A03/PNP0A08 driver can manage them is via _PRS/_CRS/_SRS, which contain -the device-specific details. The host bridge registers also include ECAM +the device-specific details. The host bridge registers also include ECAM space, since it is consumed by the host bridge. ACPI defines a Consumer/Producer bit to distinguish the bridge registers @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ the PNP0A03/PNP0A08 device itself. The workaround was to describe the bridge registers (including ECAM space) in PNP0C02 catch-all devices [6]. With the exception of ECAM, the bridge register space is device-specific anyway, so the generic PNP0A03/PNP0A08 driver (pci_root.c) has no need to -know about it. +know about it. New architectures should be able to use "Consumer" Extended Address Space descriptors in the PNP0A03 device for bridge registers, including ECAM, @@ -75,9 +75,9 @@ ia64 kernels assume all address space descriptors, including "Consumer" Extended Address Space ones, are windows, so it would not be safe to describe bridge registers this way on those architectures. -PNP0C02 "motherboard" devices are basically a catch-all. There's no +PNP0C02 "motherboard" devices are basically a catch-all. There's no programming model for them other than "don't use these resources for -anything else." So a PNP0C02 _CRS should claim any address space that is +anything else." So a PNP0C02 _CRS should claim any address space that is (1) not claimed by _CRS under any other device object in the ACPI namespace and (2) should not be assigned by the OS to something else. @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ address always corresponds to bus 0, even if the bus range below the bridge requirements of the device. It may also call _CRS to find the current resource settings for the device. Using this information, the Plug and Play system determines what resources the device should consume and - sets those resources by calling the device’s _SRS control method. + sets those resources by calling the device's _SRS control method. In ACPI, devices can consume resources (for example, legacy keyboards), provide resources (for example, a proprietary PCI bridge), or do both. @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ address always corresponds to bus 0, even if the bus range below the bridge 4.1.3) must be reserved by declaring a motherboard resource. For most systems, the motherboard resource would appear at the root of the ACPI namespace (under \_SB) in a node with a _HID of EISAID (PNP0C02), and - the resources in this case should not be claimed in the root PCI bus’s + the resources in this case should not be claimed in the root PCI bus's _CRS. The resources can optionally be returned in Int15 E820 or EFIGetMemoryMap as reserved memory but must always be reported through ACPI as a motherboard resource. -- 2.30.2
