On 2021-04-29 3:23 p.m., Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 12:53:15PM -0400, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
On 2021-04-28 12:53 p.m., Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 11:11:48AM -0400, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
This is exact copy of 'USB: add support for dev_groups to
struct usb_device_driver' patch by Greg but just for
the PCI case.
...
The usual commit citation format is 7d9c1d2f7aca ("USB: add support
for dev_groups to struct usb_device_driver") so it's easier to locate
the commit.
I see there is also b71b283e3d6d ("USB: add support for dev_groups to
struct usb_driver"). I don't know enough about USB to know whether
7d9c1d2f7aca or b71b283e3d6d is a closer analogue to what you're doing
here, but I do see that struct usb_driver is far more common than
struct usb_device_driver.
PCI has struct pci_driver, but doesn't have the concept of a struct
pci_device_driver.
Since we don't have pci_device_driver then pci_driver is the best place
for it then, no ?
Of course. My point was just that maybe you should say this is
similar to b71b283e3d6d ("USB: add support for dev_groups to struct
usb_driver"), not similar to 7d9c1d2f7aca ("USB: add support for
dev_groups to struct usb_device_driver").
Got it.
Andrey
Bjorn
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&data=04%7C01%7Candrey.grodzovsky%40amd.com%7C9778eea1c3164f9fbc5f08d90b443ba6%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637553209952825202%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=tkycS4EST1Q%2BkEWlmzocPjCxaONVk5sPzPnWmrmbfcg%3D&reserved=0
