On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 05:54:57PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 05:37:27PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 02:55:33PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 01:56:40PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 06:34:26PM +0800, Bingbu Cao wrote: > > > > > On 4/20/21 6:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:48:33AM +0800, Bingbu Cao wrote: > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > This misses the changelog from v1 followed by the explanation why resent. > > > > > > > > > > > I noticed there was a typo in the recipient list: > > > > > stable.vger.kernel.org -> stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > no code change for resent. > > > > > > > > When you're submitting a patch and want it reach the stable kernels, you'll > > > > need to add a Cc tag: > > > > > > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > But not actually add the address to cc. I dropped stable@vger address from > > > > distribution. > > > > > > Does it really matter? > > > > Usually aligning what you're doing with > > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst is not a bad idea. > > True, my point is that technically both ways will give the same result, no? If you get your patch merged this way, then yes. :-) -- Sakari Ailus
