Re: [PATCH] PCI/VPD: Use unaligned access helper in pci_vpd_write

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19.04.2021 13:10, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 18.04.2021 11:19, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> Use helper get_unaligned_le32() to simplify the code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/vpd.c | 15 +++++----------
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/vpd.c b/drivers/pci/vpd.c
>> index 60573f27a..2888bb300 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/vpd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/vpd.c
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>>  #include <linux/export.h>
>>  #include <linux/sched/signal.h>
>> +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
>>  #include "pci.h"
>>  
>>  /* VPD access through PCI 2.2+ VPD capability */
>> @@ -235,10 +236,9 @@ static ssize_t pci_vpd_read(struct pci_dev *dev, loff_t pos, size_t count,
>>  }
>>  
>>  static ssize_t pci_vpd_write(struct pci_dev *dev, loff_t pos, size_t count,
>> -			     const void *arg)
>> +			     const void *buf)
>>  {
>>  	struct pci_vpd *vpd = dev->vpd;
>> -	const u8 *buf = arg;
>>  	loff_t end = pos + count;
>>  	int ret = 0;
>>  
>> @@ -264,14 +264,8 @@ static ssize_t pci_vpd_write(struct pci_dev *dev, loff_t pos, size_t count,
>>  		goto out;
>>  
>>  	while (pos < end) {
>> -		u32 val;
>> -
>> -		val = *buf++;
>> -		val |= *buf++ << 8;
>> -		val |= *buf++ << 16;
>> -		val |= *buf++ << 24;
>> -
>> -		ret = pci_user_write_config_dword(dev, vpd->cap + PCI_VPD_DATA, val);
>> +		ret = pci_user_write_config_dword(dev, vpd->cap + PCI_VPD_DATA,
>> +						  get_unaligned_le32(buf));
>>  		if (ret < 0)
>>  			break;
>>  		ret = pci_user_write_config_word(dev, vpd->cap + PCI_VPD_ADDR,
>> @@ -286,6 +280,7 @@ static ssize_t pci_vpd_write(struct pci_dev *dev, loff_t pos, size_t count,
>>  			break;
>>  
>>  		pos += sizeof(u32);
>> +		buf += sizeof(u32);
>>  	}
>>  out:
>>  	mutex_unlock(&vpd->lock);
>>
> 
> Please disregard this patch. According to PCI 2.2 spec the address needs to be dword-aligned.
> I will address this in a separate patch.
> 
Sorry, I just confused something and wrote before finished thinking. The change is correct.



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux