On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 4:11 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 03:19:00PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > Control of EP regulators by the RC is needed because of the chicken-and-egg > > Can you expand "EP"? Not sure if this refers to "endpoint" or > something else. Yes I meant "endpoint" -- I will expand it. > > If this refers to a device in a slot, I guess it isn't necessarily aWe only support this feature for endpoint devices; it they hav > PCIe *endpoint*; it could also be a switch upstream port. True; to be precise I mean the device directly connected to the single RC port. > > > situation: although the regulator is "owned" by the EP and would be best > > handled on its driver, the EP cannot be discovered and probed unless its > > regulator is already turned on. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c > > index e330e6811f0b..b76ec7d9af32 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c > > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ > > #include <linux/pci.h> > > #include <linux/pci-ecam.h> > > #include <linux/printk.h> > > +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> > > #include <linux/reset.h> > > #include <linux/sizes.h> > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > @@ -169,6 +170,7 @@ > > #define SSC_STATUS_SSC_MASK 0x400 > > #define SSC_STATUS_PLL_LOCK_MASK 0x800 > > #define PCIE_BRCM_MAX_MEMC 3 > > +#define PCIE_BRCM_MAX_EP_REGULATORS 4 > > > > #define IDX_ADDR(pcie) (pcie->reg_offsets[EXT_CFG_INDEX]) > > #define DATA_ADDR(pcie) (pcie->reg_offsets[EXT_CFG_DATA]) > > @@ -295,8 +297,27 @@ struct brcm_pcie { > > u32 hw_rev; > > void (*perst_set)(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, u32 val); > > void (*bridge_sw_init_set)(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, u32 val); > > + struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[PCIE_BRCM_MAX_EP_REGULATORS]; > > + unsigned int num_supplies; > > }; > > > > +static int brcm_set_regulators(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, bool on) > > +{ > > + struct device *dev = pcie->dev; > > + int ret; > > + > > + if (!pcie->num_supplies) > > + return 0; > > + if (on) > > + ret = regulator_bulk_enable(pcie->num_supplies, pcie->supplies); > > + else > > + ret = regulator_bulk_disable(pcie->num_supplies, pcie->supplies); > > + if (ret) > > + dev_err(dev, "failed to %s EP regulators\n", > > + on ? "enable" : "disable"); > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > /* > > * This is to convert the size of the inbound "BAR" region to the > > * non-linear values of PCIE_X_MISC_RC_BAR[123]_CONFIG_LO.SIZE > > @@ -1141,16 +1162,63 @@ static void brcm_pcie_turn_off(struct brcm_pcie *pcie) > > pcie->bridge_sw_init_set(pcie, 1); > > } > > > > +static int brcm_pcie_get_regulators(struct brcm_pcie *pcie) > > +{ > > + struct device_node *child, *parent = pcie->np; > > + const unsigned int max_name_len = 64 + 4; > > + struct property *pp; > > + > > + /* Look for regulator supply property in the EP device subnodes */ > > + for_each_available_child_of_node(parent, child) { > > + /* > > + * Do a santiy test to ensure that this is an EP node > > s/santiy/sanity/ > > > + * (e.g. node name: "pci-ep@0,0"). The slot number > > + * should always be 0 as our controller only has a single > > + * port. > > + */ > > + const char *p = strstr(child->full_name, "@0"); > > + > > + if (!p || (p[2] && p[2] != ',')) > > + continue; > > + > > + /* Now look for regulator supply properties */ > > + for_each_property_of_node(child, pp) { > > + int i, n = strnlen(pp->name, max_name_len); > > + > > + if (n <= 7 || strncmp("-supply", &pp->name[n - 7], 7)) > > + continue; > > + > > + /* Make sure this is not a duplicate */ > > + for (i = 0; i < pcie->num_supplies; i++) > > + if (strncmp(pcie->supplies[i].supply, > > + pp->name, max_name_len) == 0) > > + continue; > > + > > + if (pcie->num_supplies < PCIE_BRCM_MAX_EP_REGULATORS) > > + pcie->supplies[pcie->num_supplies++].supply = pp->name; > > + else > > + dev_warn(pcie->dev, "No room for EP supply %s\n", > > + pp->name); > > + } > > + } > > + /* > > + * Get the regulators that the EP devices require. We cannot use > > + * pcie->dev as the device argument in regulator_bulk_get() since > > + * it will not find the regulators. Instead, use NULL and the > > + * regulators are looked up by their name. > > The comment doesn't explain the interesting part of why you need NULL > instead of "pcie->dev". I assume it has something to do with the > platform topology and its DT description. > > This appears to be the only instance in the whole kernel of a use of > regulator_bulk_get() or devm_regulator_bulk_get() with NULL. That > definitely warrants a comment, so I'm glad you've got something here. > > The regulator_bulk_get() function comment doesn't mention the > possibility of "dev == NULL", although regulator_dev_lookup(), > create_regulator(), device_link_add() do check for it being NULL, so I > guess it's not a surprise. We may call dev_err(NULL), which I thinkWe only support this feature for endpoint devices; it they hav > will *work* without crashing even though it will look like a mistake > on the output. Folks wanted me to put the "supply" in the endpoint subnode. After looking at the regulator code I assumed that using the pcie->dev in this call would not work as the supply property is not in its DT node. Turns out it works fine; I will fix it. > > > + */ > > + return regulator_bulk_get(NULL, pcie->num_supplies, pcie->supplies); > > devm_regulator_bulk_get()? Yep. > > > +} > > + > > static int brcm_pcie_suspend(struct device *dev) > > { > > struct brcm_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > - int ret; > > > > brcm_pcie_turn_off(pcie); > > - ret = brcm_phy_stop(pcie); > > + brcm_phy_stop(pcie);We only support this feature for endpoint devices; it they hav > > If we no longer care whether brcm_phy_stop() returns an error, nobody > looks at the return value and it could be void. Will fix. Thanks, Jim Quinlan Broadcom STB > > > clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk); > > > > - return ret; > > + return brcm_set_regulators(pcie, false); > > } > > > > static int brcm_pcie_resume(struct device *dev) > > @@ -1163,6 +1231,10 @@ static int brcm_pcie_resume(struct device *dev) > > base = pcie->base; > > clk_prepare_enable(pcie->clk); > > > > + ret = brcm_set_regulators(pcie, true); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + > > ret = brcm_phy_start(pcie); > > if (ret) > > goto err; > > @@ -1199,6 +1271,8 @@ static void __brcm_pcie_remove(struct brcm_pcie *pcie) > > brcm_phy_stop(pcie); > > reset_control_assert(pcie->rescal); > > clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk); > > + brcm_set_regulators(pcie, false); > > + regulator_bulk_free(pcie->num_supplies, pcie->supplies); > > } > > > > static int brcm_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > > @@ -1289,6 +1363,16 @@ static int brcm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > return ret; > > } > > > > + ret = brcm_pcie_get_regulators(pcie); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_err(pcie->dev, "failed to get regulators (err=%d)\n", ret); > > + goto fail; > > + } > > + > > + ret = brcm_set_regulators(pcie, true); > > + if (ret) > > + goto fail; > > + > > ret = brcm_pcie_setup(pcie); > > if (ret) > > goto fail; > > -- > > 2.17.1 > >