Hi Yicong, > We use format domain:bus:slot.function when print > PCI device. Use consistent format in AER messages. A small nitpick: the commit message and in the subject line it should probably use "printing" rather than "print". But I suppose whoever is going be applying this patch can fix this, so probably no need to send another version, unless you really want to do it. [...] > - pr_err("AER recover: Can not find pci_dev for %04x:%02x:%02x:%x\n", > + pr_err("AER recover: Can not find pci_dev for %04x:%02x:%02x.%x\n", > entry.domain, entry.bus, > PCI_SLOT(entry.devfn), PCI_FUNC(entry.devfn)); [...] > - pr_err("AER recover: Buffer overflow when recovering AER for %04x:%02x:%02x:%x\n", > + pr_err("AER recover: Buffer overflow when recovering AER for %04x:%02x:%02x.%x\n", > domain, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn)); Seems like a good idea! This BDF-like notation is used at few other places. Nice catch. Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@xxxxxxxxx> Krzysztof