On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 09:56:37PM +0530, Amey Narkhede wrote: > On 21/03/25 10:37AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 11:17:29AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:13:56 +0200 > > > Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: <...> > > I expect that QEMU sets same reset policy for all devices at the same > > time instead of trying per-device to guess which one works. > > > The current reset attribute does the same thing internally you described > at the end. > > And yes, you will be able to bypass kernel, but at least this interface > > will be broader than initial one that serves only SO and workarounds. > > > What does it mean by "bypassing" kernel? > I don't see any problem with SO and workaround if that is the only > way an user can use their device. Why are you expecting every vendor to > develop quirk? Also I don't see any point of using linked list to > unnecessarily complicate a simple thing. Please reread our conversation with Alex, it has answers to both of your questions. Thanks > > Thanks, > Amey
