On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 07:30:13PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 03/11/2020 02:52, Vidya Sagar wrote: > > > > > > On 11/2/2020 8:00 PM, Zhang Qilong wrote: > >> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > >> > >> > >> pm_runtime_get_sync will increment pm usage counter even it > >> failed. Forgetting to pm_runtime_put_noidle will result in > >> reference leak in pex_ep_event_pex_rst_deassert, so we should > >> fix it. > >> > >> Fixes: c57247f940e8e ("PCI: tegra: Add support for PCIe endpoint mode > >> in Tegra194") > >> Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 1 + > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c > >> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c > >> index f920e7efe118..936510b5c649 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c > >> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c > >> @@ -1662,6 +1662,7 @@ static void pex_ep_event_pex_rst_deassert(struct > >> tegra_pcie_dw *pcie) > >> > >> ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); > >> if (ret < 0) { > >> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev); > > Why can't we call pm_runtime_put_sync(dev) as that is what is being > > called in failure cases anyway further down in this API? > > > Simply because this is a failure case where the get_sync did not > complete. So this change is correct, however, now we have > pm_runtime_resume_and_get(), it is better/simpler just to replace the > pm_runtime_get_sync with pm_runtime_resume_and_get. I think this patch slipped through the cracks, should I update the patch myself with the suggestion above and merge it or you guys prefer sending it ? Thanks, Lorenzo