On Tue, Mar 09 2021 at 16:21, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2021-03-09 16:00:37 [+0100], To Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h
>> index 07c7329d21aa7..1c14ccd351091 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
>> @@ -663,15 +663,6 @@ static inline int tasklet_trylock(struct tasklet_struct *t)
>> void tasklet_unlock(struct tasklet_struct *t);
>> void tasklet_unlock_wait(struct tasklet_struct *t);
>>
>> -/*
>> - * Do not use in new code. Waiting for tasklets from atomic contexts is
>> - * error prone and should be avoided.
>> - */
>> -static inline void tasklet_unlock_spin_wait(struct tasklet_struct *t)
>> -{
>> - while (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &t->state))
>> - cpu_relax();
>> -}
>
> Look at that. The forward declaration for tasklet_unlock_spin_wait()
> should have remained. Sorry for that.
No idea how I managed to mess that up and fail to notice. Brown
paperbags to the rescue.
Thanks,
tglx
