Em Wed, 3 Feb 2021 16:18:01 +0100
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> Thank you for working on this!
>
> > @@ -151,8 +152,10 @@ struct kirin_pcie {
> > struct clk *phy_ref_clk;
> > struct clk *pcie_aclk;
> > struct clk *pcie_aux_clk;
> > - int gpio_id_reset[4];
> > + int n_gpio_resets;
> > int gpio_id_clkreq[3];
> > + int gpio_id_reset[MAX_GPIO_RESETS];
> > + const char *reset_names[MAX_GPIO_RESETS];
> > u32 eye_param[5];
> > };
> [...]
>
> A small nit, so feel free to ignore, of course.
>
> The "n_gpio_resets" variable might be better as "gpio_resets_num" or
> "gpio_resets_count" - both are popular name suffixes for that type of
> variables. To add, other variables also start with "gpio_", thus it
> would also follow the naming pattern.
>
> [...]
> > + kirin_pcie->n_gpio_resets = of_gpio_named_count(np, "reset-gpios");
> [...]
>
> This would then become (for example):
>
> kirin_pcie->gpio_resets_count = of_gpio_named_count(np, "reset-gpios");
Ok. Will change it at the next round.
Thanks,
Mauro
