Re: [PATCH V4] PCI: rcar: Add L1 link state fix into data abort hook

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/10/20 1:12 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:

[...]

+static int __init rcar_pcie_init(void)
+{
+	if (of_find_matching_node(NULL, rcar_pcie_abort_handler_of_match)) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE
+		hook_fault_code(17, rcar_pcie_aarch32_abort_handler, SIGBUS, 0,
+				"asynchronous external abort");
+#else
+		hook_fault_code(22, rcar_pcie_aarch32_abort_handler, SIGBUS, 0,
+				"imprecise external abort");
+#endif
+	}
+
+	return platform_driver_register(&rcar_pcie_driver);
+}
+device_initcall(rcar_pcie_init);
+#else
   builtin_platform_driver(rcar_pcie_driver);
+#endif

Is the device_initcall() vs builtin_platform_driver() something
related to the hook_fault_code()?  What would break if this were
always builtin_platform_driver()?

rcar_pcie_init() would not be called before probe.

Sorry to be slow, but why does it need to be called before probe?
Obviously software isn't putting the controller in D3 or enabling ASPM
before probe.

I don't understand it either so it would be good to clarify.

The hook_fault_code() is marked __init, so if probe() was deferred and the kernel __init memory was free'd, attempt to call hook_fault_code() from probe would lead to a crash.

Also, some of these platforms are SMP systems, I don't understand
what prevents multiple cores to fault at once given that the faults
can happen for config/io/mem accesses alike.

I understand that the immediate fix is for S2R, that is single
threaded but I would like to understand how comprehensive this fix
is.

Are you suggesting to add some sort of locking ?



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux