Re: [patch 17/30] NTB/msi: Use irq_has_action()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2020-12-10 12:25 p.m., Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Use the proper core function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Allen Hubbe <allenbh@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-ntb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  drivers/ntb/msi.c |    4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/drivers/ntb/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ntb/msi.c
> @@ -282,15 +282,13 @@ int ntbm_msi_request_threaded_irq(struct
>  				  struct ntb_msi_desc *msi_desc)
>  {
>  	struct msi_desc *entry;
> -	struct irq_desc *desc;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!ntb->msi)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	for_each_pci_msi_entry(entry, ntb->pdev) {
> -		desc = irq_to_desc(entry->irq);
> -		if (desc->action)
> +		if (irq_has_action(entry->irq))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&ntb->dev, entry->irq, handler,
> 



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux