Re: [PATCH v11 2/5] ACPI/PCI: Ignore _OSC negotiation result if pcie_ports_native is set.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 11/25/20 12:28 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 07:57:05PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
pcie_ports_native is set only if user requests native handling
of PCIe capabilities via pcie_port_setup command line option.
User input takes precedence over _OSC based control negotiation
result. So consider the _OSC negotiated result only if
pcie_ports_native is unset.

Also, since struct pci_host_bridge ->native_* members caches the
ownership status of various PCIe capabilities, use them instead
of distributed checks for pcie_ports_native.

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
index 50a9522ab07d..ccd5e0ce5605 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
@@ -208,8 +208,7 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
  	struct pci_host_bridge *host = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->bus);
  	int services = 0;
- if (dev->is_hotplug_bridge &&
-	    (pcie_ports_native || host->native_pcie_hotplug)) {
+	if (dev->is_hotplug_bridge && host->native_pcie_hotplug) {

This is a nit, but I think this and similar checks should be reordered
so we do the most generic test first, i.e.,

   if (host->native_pcie_hotplug && dev->is_hotplug_bridge)
ok. I can add this fix on top of your update.

Logically there's no point in looking at the device things if we
don't have native control.

  		services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_HP;
/*
@@ -221,8 +220,7 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
  	}
#ifdef CONFIG_PCIEAER
-	if (dev->aer_cap && pci_aer_available() &&
-	    (pcie_ports_native || host->native_aer)) {
+	if (dev->aer_cap && pci_aer_available() && host->native_aer) {

Can't we clear host->native_aer when pci_aer_available() returns
false?  I'd like to have all the checks about whether we have native
control to be in one place instead of being scattered.  Something like
this above:

   OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL, host_bridge->native_aer);
   if (!pci_aer_available())
     host_bridge->native_aer = 0;

So this test would become:

   if (host->native_aer && dev->aer_cap)
We already use it in pci_root.c to confirm AER availability before
we request control over it via _OSC. So if pci_aer_available() is false
OSC_*AER_CONTROL bit in ctrl_set will be left zero (which means
->native_aer will also be zero).

490         if (pci_aer_available())
491                 control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;

So, may we don't need pci_aer_available() check here.


  		services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER;
/*
@@ -238,8 +236,7 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
  	 * Event Collectors can also generate PMEs, but we don't handle
  	 * those yet.
  	 */
-	if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT &&
-	    (pcie_ports_native || host->native_pme)) {
+	if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT && host->native_pme) {
  		services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_PME;

Also here:

   if (host->native_pme && pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)


--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux