On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:38 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [+to Rafael, author of the commit you mentioned, > +cc Mika, Kai Heng, Lukas, linux-pm, linux-kernel] > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 04:56:09PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > > More than 10 yrs ago Runtime PM was disabled per default by bb910a7040 > > ("PCI/PM Runtime: Make runtime PM of PCI devices inactive by default"). > > > > Reason given: "avoid breakage on systems where ACPI-based wake-up is > > known to fail for some devices" > > Unfortunately the commit message doesn't mention any affected devices > > or systems. Even if it did that, it wouldn't have been a full list almost for sure. We had received multiple problem reports related to that, most likely because the ACPI PM in BIOSes at that time was tailored for system-wide PM transitions only. > > With Runtime PM disabled e.g. the PHY on network devices may remain > > powered up even with no cable plugged in, affecting battery lifetime > > on mobile devices. Currently we have to rely on the respective distro > > or user to enable Runtime PM via sysfs (echo auto > power/control). > > Some devices work around this restriction by calling pm_runtime_allow > > in their probe routine, even though that's not recommended by > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/power/pci.txt > > > > Disabling Runtime PM per default seems to be a big hammer, a quirk > > for affected devices / systems may had been better. And we still > > have the option to disable Runtime PM for selected devices via sysfs. > > > > So, to cut a long story short: Wouldn't it be time to remove this > > restriction? > > I don't know the history of this, but maybe Rafael or the others can > shed some light on it. The systems that had those problems 10 years ago would still have them, but I expect there to be more systems where runtime PM can be enabled by default for PCI devices without issues.