On 2019/11/21 上午1:05, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 12:54:19PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> The 0V9 and 1V8 supplies power the PCIe block in the SoC itself, and
>> are thus fundamental to PCIe being usable at all. As such, it makes
>> sense to treat them as non-optional and rely on dummy regulators if
>> not explicitly described.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c | 69 ++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
> Applied to pci/rockchip, thanks.
Sorry, this commit is cause regression for RK3399 boards unable to
detect the controller anymore.
The 1v8 (and 0v9) is causing -517 and reject the controller initialization.
I'm not a PCI guy, but a quick google search shows these two voltages
are not related to PCIE core functionality, especially considering the
controller used in RK3399 are mostly to provide NVME support.
This bug makes all RK3399 users who put root fs into NVME driver unable
to boot the device.
I really hope some one could test the patch before affecting the end
users or at least try to understand how most users would use the PCIE
interface for.
Thanks,
Qu
>
> Lorenzo
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
>> index ef8e677ce9d1..68525f8ac4d9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
>> @@ -620,19 +620,13 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_parse_host_dt(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>> dev_info(dev, "no vpcie3v3 regulator found\n");
>> }
>>
>> - rockchip->vpcie1v8 = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vpcie1v8");
>> - if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8)) {
>> - if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8) != -ENODEV)
>> - return PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>> - dev_info(dev, "no vpcie1v8 regulator found\n");
>> - }
>> + rockchip->vpcie1v8 = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vpcie1v8");
>> + if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8))
>> + return PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>>
>> - rockchip->vpcie0v9 = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vpcie0v9");
>> - if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9)) {
>> - if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9) != -ENODEV)
>> - return PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>> - dev_info(dev, "no vpcie0v9 regulator found\n");
>> - }
>> + rockchip->vpcie0v9 = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vpcie0v9");
>> + if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9))
>> + return PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -658,27 +652,22 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_set_vpcie(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8)) {
>> - err = regulator_enable(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>> - if (err) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "fail to enable vpcie1v8 regulator\n");
>> - goto err_disable_3v3;
>> - }
>> + err = regulator_enable(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>> + if (err) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "fail to enable vpcie1v8 regulator\n");
>> + goto err_disable_3v3;
>> }
>>
>> - if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9)) {
>> - err = regulator_enable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>> - if (err) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "fail to enable vpcie0v9 regulator\n");
>> - goto err_disable_1v8;
>> - }
>> + err = regulator_enable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>> + if (err) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "fail to enable vpcie0v9 regulator\n");
>> + goto err_disable_1v8;
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>> err_disable_1v8:
>> - if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8))
>> - regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>> + regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>> err_disable_3v3:
>> if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3))
>> regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie3v3);
>> @@ -897,8 +886,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused rockchip_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
>>
>> rockchip_pcie_disable_clocks(rockchip);
>>
>> - if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9))
>> - regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>> + regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>> @@ -908,12 +896,10 @@ static int __maybe_unused rockchip_pcie_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
>> struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> int err;
>>
>> - if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9)) {
>> - err = regulator_enable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>> - if (err) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "fail to enable vpcie0v9 regulator\n");
>> - return err;
>> - }
>> + err = regulator_enable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>> + if (err) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "fail to enable vpcie0v9 regulator\n");
>> + return err;
>> }
>>
>> err = rockchip_pcie_enable_clocks(rockchip);
>> @@ -939,8 +925,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused rockchip_pcie_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
>> err_pcie_resume:
>> rockchip_pcie_disable_clocks(rockchip);
>> err_disable_0v9:
>> - if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9))
>> - regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>> + regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1081,10 +1066,8 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie12v);
>> if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3))
>> regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie3v3);
>> - if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8))
>> - regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>> - if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9))
>> - regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>> + regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>> + regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>> err_set_vpcie:
>> rockchip_pcie_disable_clocks(rockchip);
>> return err;
>> @@ -1108,10 +1091,8 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie12v);
>> if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3))
>> regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie3v3);
>> - if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8))
>> - regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>> - if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9))
>> - regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>> + regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>> + regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
