Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: dwc: Add support to configure for ECRC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 10/26/2020 2:19 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments


On 10/25/20, 3:31 AM, Vidya Sagar wrote:

DesignWare core has a TLP digest (TD) override bit in one of the control
registers of ATU. This bit also needs to be programmed for proper ECRC
functionality. This is currently identified as an issue with DesignWare
IP version 4.90a. This patch does the required programming in ATU upon
querying the system policy for ECRC.

Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 8 ++++++--
  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 2 ++
  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
index b5e438b70cd5..810dcbdbe869 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no,
                                lower_32_bits(pci_addr));
       dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UNR_UPPER_TARGET,
                                upper_32_bits(pci_addr));
-     val = type | PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no);
+     val = type | PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no) | pci->td << PCIE_ATU_TD_SHIFT;
       val = upper_32_bits(size - 1) ?
               val | PCIE_ATU_INCREASE_REGION_SIZE : val;
       dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UNR_REGION_CTRL1, val);
@@ -295,7 +295,8 @@ static void __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no,
       dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET,
                          upper_32_bits(pci_addr));
       dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_CR1, type |
-                        PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no));
+                        PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no) |
+                        pci->td << PCIE_ATU_TD_SHIFT);
       dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_CR2, PCIE_ATU_ENABLE);

       /*
@@ -565,6 +566,9 @@ void dw_pcie_setup(struct dw_pcie *pci)
       dev_dbg(pci->dev, "iATU unroll: %s\n", pci->iatu_unroll_enabled ?
               "enabled" : "disabled");

+     if (pci->version == 0x490A)
+             pci->td = pcie_is_ecrc_enabled();
+
       if (pci->link_gen > 0)
               dw_pcie_link_set_max_speed(pci, pci->link_gen);

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
index 21dd06831b50..d34723e42e79 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@
  #define PCIE_ATU_TYPE_IO             0x2
  #define PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG0           0x4
  #define PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG1           0x5
+#define PCIE_ATU_TD_SHIFT            8
  #define PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(pf)           ((pf) << 20)
  #define PCIE_ATU_CR2                 0x908
  #define PCIE_ATU_ENABLE                      BIT(31)
@@ -276,6 +277,7 @@ struct dw_pcie {
       int                     num_lanes;
       int                     link_gen;
       u8                      n_fts[2];
+     bool                    td;     /* TLP Digest (for ECRC purpose) */

If possible, don't add a new variable to 'dw_pcie' structure.
Please find a way to set TD bit without adding a new variable to 'dw_pcie' structure'.

I can use pcie_is_ecrc_enabled() directly in place of pci->td. That should be fine right? BTW, curious to know if there is any specific reason behind asking not to add any new variables to 'dw_pcie' structure?


Best regards,
Jingoo Han

  };

  #define to_dw_pcie_from_pp(port) container_of((port), struct dw_pcie, pp)
--
2.17.1




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux