Re: [PATCH v7 07/13] PCI/AER: Extend AER error handling to RCECs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1 Oct 2020, at 16:14, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 02:58:14PM -0700, Sean V Kelley wrote:
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>

Currently the kernel does not handle AER errors for Root Complex
integrated End Points (RCiEPs)[0]. These devices sit on a root bus within the Root Complex (RC). AER handling is performed by a Root Complex Event Collector (RCEC) [1] which is a effectively a type of RCiEP on the same
root bus.

For an RCEC (technically not a Bridge), error messages "received" from associated RCiEPs must be enabled for "transmission" in order to cause a System Error via the Root Control register or (when the Advanced Error
Reporting Capability is present) reporting via the Root Error Command
register and logging in the Root Error Status register and Error Source
Identification register.

In addition to the defined OS level handling of the reset flow for the
associated RCiEPs of an RCEC, it is possible to also have non-native
handling. In that case there is no need to take any actions on the RCEC because the firmware is responsible for them. This is true where APEI [2]
is used to report the AER errors via a GHES[v2] HEST entry [3] and
relevant AER CPER record [4] and non-native handling is in use.

We effectively end up with two different types of discovery for
purposes of handling AER errors:

1) Normal bus walk - we pass the downstream port above a bus to which
the device is attached and it walks everything below that point.

2) An RCiEP with no visible association with an RCEC as there is no need to walk devices. In that case, the flow is to just call the callbacks for
the actual device, which in turn references its associated RCEC.

A new walk function pci_walk_bridge(), similar to pci_walk_bus(),
is provided that takes a pci_dev instead of a bus. If that bridge
corresponds to a downstream port it will walk the subordinate bus of
that bridge. If the device does not then it will call the function on
that device alone.

[0] ACPI PCI Express Base Specification 5.0-1 1.3.2.3 Root Complex
Integrated Endpoint Rules.
[1] ACPI PCI Express Base Specification 5.0-1 6.2 Error Signalling and
Logging
[2] ACPI Specification 6.3 Chapter 18 ACPI Platform Error Interface (APEI)
[3] ACPI Specification 6.3 18.2.3.7 Generic Hardware Error Source
[4] UEFI Specification 2.8, N.2.7 PCI Express Error Section

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pci/pcie/err.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
index 9e552330155b..c4ceca42a3bf 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
@@ -146,44 +146,73 @@ static int report_resume(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
 	return 0;
 }

+/**
+ * pci_walk_bridge - walk bridges potentially AER affected
+ * @bridge   bridge which may be an RCEC with associated RCiEPs,
+ *           an RCiEP associated with an RCEC, or a Port.
+ * @cb       callback to be called for each device found
+ * @userdata arbitrary pointer to be passed to callback.
+ *
+ * If the device provided is a bridge, walk the subordinate bus,
+ * including any bridged devices on buses under this bus.
+ * Call the provided callback on each device found.
+ *
+ * If the device provided has no subordinate bus, call the provided
+ * callback on the device itself.
+ */
+static void pci_walk_bridge(struct pci_dev *bridge, int (*cb)(struct pci_dev *, void *),
+			    void *userdata)
+{
+	if (bridge->subordinate)
+		pci_walk_bus(bridge->subordinate, cb, userdata);
+	else
+		cb(bridge, userdata);
+}
+
 pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev,
 			pci_channel_state_t state,
pci_ers_result_t (*reset_subordinate_devices)(struct pci_dev *pdev))
 {
 	pci_ers_result_t status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER;
-	struct pci_bus *bus;
 	struct pci_dev *bridge;
 	int type;

 	/*
 	 * Error recovery runs on all subordinates of the first downstream
 	 * bridge. If the downstream bridge detected the error, it is
-	 * cleared at the end.
+ * cleared at the end. For RCiEPs we should reset just the RCiEP itself.
 	 */
 	type = pci_pcie_type(dev);
 	if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
-	    type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM)
+	    type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM ||
+	    type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC ||
+	    type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END)
 		bridge = dev;
 	else
 		bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);

-	bus = bridge->subordinate;
 	pci_dbg(dev, "broadcast error_detected message\n");
 	if (state == pci_channel_io_frozen) {
-		pci_walk_bus(bus, report_frozen_detected, &status);
-		status = reset_subordinate_device(dev);
+		pci_walk_bridge(bridge, report_frozen_detected, &status);

Wonder if it would be worth splitting out the pci_walk_bus() to
pci_walk_bridge() change -- initially pci_walk_bridge() would do only
this:

  if (bridge->subordinate)
    pci_walk_bus(bridge->subordinate, cb, userdata);

so basically just rename it and move the bridge->subordinate
dereference out.

Sure, that’s fine. It was actually something that crossed my mind when I was doing this prior splitting out because I realized I still needed to dereference the bus and was disappointed to keep it here.



Then the next patch would be a lot smaller and would add the
!bridge->subordinate case (which I think is only for RC_EC & RC_END?)

Correct the check on bridge && bridge->subordinate comes in with the RC_EC & RC_END


+		if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END) {
+ pci_warn(dev, "subordinate device reset not possible for RCiEP\n");
+			status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE;
+			goto failed;
+		}
+
+		status = reset_subordinate_devices(bridge);

I missed the reason for this change:

  -		status = reset_subordinate_device(dev);
  +		status = reset_subordinate_devices(bridge);

This should have happened in the ‘bridge’ renaming patch. This was going to be either a reset of dev or dev->bus->self depending on the type via the assignment of dev = prior to renaming in (5/13). I should move this change back to the bridge renaming patch.

Thanks,

Sean


 		if (status != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) {
 			pci_warn(dev, "subordinate device reset failed\n");
 			goto failed;
 		}
 	} else {
-		pci_walk_bus(bus, report_normal_detected, &status);
+		pci_walk_bridge(bridge, report_normal_detected, &status);
 	}

 	if (status == PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER) {
 		status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
 		pci_dbg(dev, "broadcast mmio_enabled message\n");
-		pci_walk_bus(bus, report_mmio_enabled, &status);
+		pci_walk_bridge(bridge, report_mmio_enabled, &status);
 	}

 	if (status == PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET) {
@@ -194,17 +223,18 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev,
 		 */
 		status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
 		pci_dbg(dev, "broadcast slot_reset message\n");
-		pci_walk_bus(bus, report_slot_reset, &status);
+		pci_walk_bridge(bridge, report_slot_reset, &status);
 	}

 	if (status != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED)
 		goto failed;

 	pci_dbg(dev, "broadcast resume message\n");
-	pci_walk_bus(bus, report_resume, &status);
+	pci_walk_bridge(bridge, report_resume, &status);

 	if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
-	    type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM) {
+	    type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM ||
+	    type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC) {
 		if (pcie_aer_is_native(bridge))
 			pcie_clear_device_status(bridge);
 		pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(bridge);
--
2.28.0




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux