Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] igb/ixgbe: add code to trigger function reset if reset_devices is set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(2010/08/06 1:27), David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 01:15 -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Jeff Kirsher<jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:59:12 -0700

From: Alexander Duyck<alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxx>

This change makes it so that both igb and ixgbe can trigger a full pcie
function reset if the reset_devices kernel parameter is defined.  The main
reason for adding this is that kdump can cause serious issues when the
kdump kernel resets the IOMMU while DMA transactions are still occurring.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck<alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher<jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>

I tend to disagree with the essence of this change.

Which is that we should add workaround after workaround for things
that aren't functioning properly in kdump and kexec.

They should have a pass that shuts devices down properly, so that this
kind of stuff doesn't need to happen in the kernel we then boot into.

For a normal kexec, arguably true.

But in the kdump case, the original kernel has *crashed* and we really
don't have that option -- we need to jump *straight* to the new kernel
and have it reset the hardware.

The device driver really *ought* to be able to reset the hardware from
whatever state it's in when the new kernel starts up. Anything less is
broken, and reminds me of those crappy drivers that only work after a
soft-reboot from Windows.

Most drivers *do* quite happily initialise their device and reliably get
it into a known state; it's just that this particular hardware goes into
a *particularly* stroppy fit when it gets a DMA master abort (which is
what happens when the IOMMU stops it from scribbling into memory after
the new kernel has taken over).

What happens on non-PCIE systems then?  Do they just lose when this
happens?

If they have a device that's this broken, and the driver can't get it
into a working state any other way, then yes -- I don't see any way to
*avoid* them losing.

What about asserting secondary RST# on the bridge?
It would not work for devices on the root bus though.

Thanks,
Kenji Kaneshige

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux