Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] PCI: skip release and reallocation of io port resources

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew, Can you check if this patch resolves your PAT issue?

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127833440902862&w=2

thanks,
suresh

On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 11:35 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> This looks like a different issue, I think the PAT code tracks memtypes
> like this.
> 
> Suresh, any changes in this area that might explain this?
> 
> Jesse
> 
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 14:28:47 +1000
> Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Is this the same or related issue?
> > 
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/6/108
> > New messages since -rc4, X and graphics really slow after.
> > 
> > [    1.387013] swapper:1 freeing invalid memtype bf788000-bf789000
> > [    1.387409] swapper:1 freeing invalid memtype bf789000-bf78a000
> > [    5.999675] modprobe:548 freeing invalid memtype d0000000-d0040000
> > [    6.068347] modprobe:548 freeing invalid memtype d0140000-d0150000
> > [    6.068647] modprobe:548 freeing invalid memtype d0150000-d0160000
> > [    6.069661] modprobe:548 freeing invalid memtype d0170000-d01f0000
> > [    6.085969] modprobe:548 freeing invalid memtype d01f0000-d0200000
> > [    6.087673] modprobe:548 freeing invalid memtype d0210000-d0220000
> > [    6.087900] modprobe:548 freeing invalid memtype d0220000-d0230000
> > [    6.088092] modprobe:548 freeing invalid memtype d0230000-d0240000
> > [    6.088317] modprobe:548 freeing invalid memtype d0240000-d0250000
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On 07/06/2010 04:58 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> So you want to use pci=override_bios to reallocate all bios assigned resource include
> > >>> peer root buses resources and pci bridge resource and pci devices BAR?
> > >>
> > >> In a perfect world, we'd never need this at all, but sicne that's not
> > >> an option, the second-best alternative might be something like the
> > >> following:
> > >>
> > >>   pci=override=off # default
> > >>   pci=override=conflict # override only on conflicts
> > >>   pci=override=<device> # clear BIOS allocations for <device> (and any
> > >> children, if it's a bus)
> > >
> > > current:
> > > if there is conflict, like pci bridge resources or pci devices resources is not in the scope of peer root bus resource range.
> > > or pci devices is not in pci bridge resources range.
> > > kernel would reject the resource and try to get new range in parent resource for the children.
> > >
> > > so current default is overriding the conflicts already.
> > >
> > > Maybe your conflicts have other meaning? like pci bridge resource size is not big enough?
> > >
> > > or we can have use
> > >
> > > pci=override=small_bridge
> > >
> > > or
> > >
> > > pci=override=bridges
> > >
> > > instead?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Yinghai
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> > >
> > 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux